Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol
- PMID: 24885669
- PMCID: PMC4017969
- DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-52
Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol
Abstract
Background: Robotic surgery offers many potential benefits for patients. While an increasing number of healthcare providers are purchasing surgical robots, there are reports that the technology is failing to be introduced into routine practice. Additionally, in robotic surgery, the surgeon is physically separated from the patient and the rest of the team, with the potential to negatively impact teamwork in the operating theatre. The aim of this study is to ascertain: how and under what circumstances robotic surgery is effectively introduced into routine practice; and how and under what circumstances robotic surgery impacts teamwork, communication and decision making, and subsequent patient outcomes.
Methods and design: We will undertake a process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robotic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Realist evaluation provides an overall framework for the study. The study will be in three phases. In Phase I, grey literature will be reviewed to identify stakeholders' theories concerning how robotic surgery becomes embedded into surgical practice and its impacts. These theories will be refined and added to through interviews conducted across English hospitals that are using robotic surgery for rectal cancer resection with staff at different levels of the organisation, along with a review of documentation associated with the introduction of robotic surgery. In Phase II, a multi-site case study will be conducted across four English hospitals to test and refine the candidate theories. Data will be collected using multiple methods: the structured observation tool OTAS (Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery); video recordings of operations; ethnographic observation; and interviews. In Phase III, interviews will be conducted at the four case sites with staff representing a range of surgical disciplines, to assess the extent to which the results of Phase II are generalisable and to refine the resulting theories to reflect the experience of a broader range of surgical disciplines. The study will provide (i) guidance to healthcare organisations on factors likely to facilitate successful implementation and integration of robotic surgery, and (ii) guidance on how to ensure effective communication and teamwork when undertaking robotic surgery.
Similar articles
-
Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e028635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31203248 Free PMC article.
-
A realist process evaluation of robot-assisted surgery: integration into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration and decision-making.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Jun. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Jun. PMID: 28813131 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Robotic surgery and its impact on teamwork in the operating theatre.J Perioper Pract. 2016 Mar;26(3):42-5. doi: 10.1177/175045891602600303. J Perioper Pract. 2016. PMID: 27149832
-
Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves.Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):558-68. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3698-0. Epub 2014 Jul 17. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25030474
-
Towards achieving interorganisational collaboration between health-care providers: a realist evidence synthesis.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(6):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KPLT1423. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37469292
Cited by
-
Interventions in randomised controlled trials in surgery: issues to consider during trial design.Trials. 2015 Sep 4;16:392. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0918-4. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26337522 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e028635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31203248 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the implementation of a national clinical programme for diabetes to standardise and improve services: a realist evaluation protocol.Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 28;11:107. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0464-9. Implement Sci. 2016. PMID: 27464711 Free PMC article.
-
A Handheld Robot for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery: Updated Preclinical Validation Study (IDEAL Stage 0).J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024 Apr 15;86(2):191-198. doi: 10.1055/a-2297-3647. eCollection 2025 Apr. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2024. PMID: 40104539 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of Communication in Robotic Surgery and Surgical Outcomes.JSLS. 2016 Jul-Sep;20(3):e2016.00026. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00026. JSLS. 2016. PMID: 27493469 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Smith A, Smith J, Jayne DG. Telerobotics: surgery for the 21st century. Surgery (Oxford) 2006;24:74–78. doi: 10.1383/surg.2006.24.2.74. - DOI
-
- Lapco National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. [ http://www.lapco.nhs.uk] - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical