Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 May 19:14:145.
doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-145.

Olanzapine is superior to lamotrigine in the prevention of bipolar depression: a naturalistic observational study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Olanzapine is superior to lamotrigine in the prevention of bipolar depression: a naturalistic observational study

Pei-Yin Pan et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Bipolar disorder is a highly recurrent disease and has great impact on the function of patients. Depressive symptoms consist of more than 50% of life time during the illness and may lead to self harm or suicidal behaviors. Little is known about the antidepressant effects of olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, as monotherapy despite its indication for preventing manic episodes. In contrast, lamotrigine, a mood stabilizer, has been proven to be effective in preventing depression in patients with bipolar disorder. However, no studies have compared the efficacy between lamotrigine and olanzapine in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. This enriched naturalistic study was implemented to assess the effectiveness of olanzapine and lamotrigine as monotherapy in the prevention of recurrence of bipolar disorder.

Methods: Patients with bipolar disorder in a euthymic state (Young's Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score <12, and 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score <7) for at least two months, having already received either olanzapine or lamotrigine as the maintenance treatment were recruited. The patients maintained with olanzapine (n = 22) were applied to olanzapine group whereas those maintained with lamotrigine (n = 29) were applied to lamotrigine group. They were followed up for 12 months. Differences in the efficacy between olanzapine and lamotrigine in recurrence prevention were analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate time-to-recurrence curves, and differences between the two groups were compared using the log-rank test.

Results: Olanzapine had a significantly lower recurrence rate of depressive episodes than lamotrigine (20.0% vs. 57.7%, χ2 = 6.62, p = .010). However, olanzapine and lamotrigine had similar mania (15.0% vs. 0%, χ2 = 4.17, p = .075, Fisher's exact test) and any mood episode (35.0% vs. 57.7%, χ2 = 2.33, p = .127) recurrence rates. Olanzapine was significantly superior to lamotrigine in the time to recurrence of depressive episodes (χ2 = 4.55, df = 1, p = .033), but there was no difference in the time to recurrence of any mood episode (χ2 = 1.68, df = 1, p = .195).

Conclusions: This prospective naturalistic study suggests that olanzapine is more effective than lamotrigine in the prevention of depressive episodes in patients with bipolar disorder. Future large-scale randomized studies are warranted to validate our results.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01864551.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition during the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time to recurrence into depressive episode: Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The olanzapine group had a significantly longer time to recurrence into depressive episode than the lamotrigine group (χ2 = 4.55, df = 1, p = .033, log-rank test).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to recurrence into any mood episode: Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The olanzapine group did not differ from the lamotrigine group in time to recurrence to any mood episode (χ2 = 1.68, df = 1, p = .195, log-rank test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tohen M, Waternaux CM, Tsuang MT. Outcome in Mania. A 4-year prospective follow-up of 75 patients utilizing survival analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;47(12):1106–11. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810240026005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coryell W, Keller M, Endicott J, Andreasen N, Clayton P, Hirschfeld R. Bipolar II illness: course and outcome over a five-year period. Psychol med. 1989;19(1):129–41. doi: 10.1017/S0033291700011090. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gitlin MJ, Swendsen J, Heller TL, Hammen C. Relapse and impairment in bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152(11):1635–40. - PubMed
    1. Keller MB, Lavori PW, Coryell W, Endicott J, Mueller TI. Bipolar I: a five-year prospective follow-up. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993;181(4):238–45. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199304000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tohen M, Zarate CA Jr, Hennen J, Khalsa HM, Strakowski SM, Gebre-Medhin P, Salvatore P, Baldessarini RJ. The McLean-Harvard first-episode mania study: prediction of recovery and first recurrence. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(12):2099–107. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.12.2099. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data