Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 1:14:156.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-156.

Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?

Affiliations

Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?

Françoise Vendittelli et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The number of infants with a birth weight > 97th percentile for gestational age has increased over the years. Although some studies have examined the interest of inducing labor for fetuses with macrosomia suspected in utero, only a few have analyzed this suspected macrosomia according to estimated weight at each gestational age. Most studies have focused principally on neonatal rather than on maternal (and still less on perineal) outcomes. The principal aim of this study was to assess whether a policy of induction of labor for women with a constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetus might reduce the occurrence of severe perineal tears; the secondary aims of this work were to assess whether this policy would reduce either recourse to cesarean delivery during labor or neonatal complications.

Methods: This historical cohort study (n = 3077) analyzed records from a French perinatal database. Women without diabetes and with a cephalic singleton term pregnancy were eligible for the study. We excluded medically indicated terminations of pregnancy and in utero fetal deaths. Among the pregnancies with fetuses suspected, before birth, of being large-for-gestational-age, we compared those for whom labor was induced from ≥ 37 weeks to ≤ 38 weeks+ 6 days (n = 199) to those with expectant obstetrical management (n = 2878). In this intention-to-treat analysis, results were expressed as crude and adjusted relative risks.

Results: The mean birth weight was 4012 g ± 421 g. The rate of perineal lesions did not differ between the two groups in either primiparas (aRR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.86-1.31) or multiparas (aRR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.84-1.05). Similarly, neither the cesarean rate (aRR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.82-1.50) nor the risks of resuscitation in the delivery room or of death in the delivery room or in the immediate postpartum or of neonatal transfer to the NICU (aRR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.59-1.50) differed between the two groups.

Conclusions: A policy of induction of labor for women with a constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetus among women without diabetes does not reduce maternal morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Description of the selection of patients for the study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Association des Utilisateurs de Dossiers Informatisés en Pédiatrie, Obstétrique et Gynécologie. Database access. [ http://www.audipog.net/interro-choix.php] - PubMed
    1. Vendittelli F, Rivière O, Crenn-Hébert C, Giraud-Roufast A. Do perinatal guidelines have an impact on obstetric practices? Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2012;60:355–362. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2012.03.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français. French episiotomy guideline 2006. [ http://www.cngof.asso.fr/D_PAGES/PURPC_14.HTM]
    1. De Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Walleburg HCS. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during deliver. Bri J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108:383–387. - PubMed
    1. Angioli R, Gomez-Marin O, Cantuaria G, O’Sullivan M. Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the University of Miami experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1083–1085. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.105403. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms