Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 May 6:14:119.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-119.

An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

An equivalence evaluation of a nurse-moderated group-based internet support program for new mothers versus standard care: a pragmatic preference randomised controlled trial

Alyssa C P Sawyer et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: All mothers in South Australia are offered a clinic or home-visit by a Child and Family Health community nurse in the initial postnatal weeks. Subsequent support is available on request from staff in community clinics and from a telephone helpline. The aim of the present study is to compare equivalence of a single clinic-based appointment plus a nurse-moderated group-based internet intervention when infants were aged 0-6 months versus a single home-visit together with subsequent standard services (the latter support was available to mothers in both study groups).

Methods/design: The evaluation utilised a pragmatic preference randomised trial comparing the equivalence of outcomes for mothers and infants across the two study groups. Eligible mothers were those whose services were provided by nurses working in one of six community clinics in the metropolitan region of Adelaide. Mothers were excluded if they did not have internet access, required an interpreter, or their nurse clinician recommended that they not participate due to issues such as domestic violence or substance abuse. Randomisation was based on the service identification number sequentially assigned to infants when referred to the Child and Family Health Services from birthing units (this was done by administrative staff who had no involvement in recruiting mothers, delivering the intervention, or analyzing results for the study). Consistent with design and power calculations, 819 mothers were recruited to the trial. The primary outcomes for the trial are parents' sense of competence and self-efficacy measured using standard self-report questionnaires. Secondary outcomes include the quality of mother-infant relationships, maternal social support, role satisfaction and maternal mental health, infant social-emotional and language development, and patterns of service utilisation. Maternal and infant outcomes will be evaluated using age-appropriate questionnaires when infants are aged <2 months (pre-intervention), 9, 15, and 21 months.

Discussion: We know of no previous study that has evaluated an intervention that combines the capacity of nurse and internet-based services to improve outcomes for mothers and infants. The knowledge gained from this study will inform the design and conduct of community-based postnatal mother and child support programs.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000204741.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow diagram and overview of procedure.

References

    1. Olds DL. Prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses: from randomized trials to community replication. Prevent Sci. 2002;3(3):153–172. doi: 10.1023/A:1019990432161. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De la Rosa IA, Perry J, Johnson V. Benefits of increased home-visitation services: exploring a case management model. Fam Community Health. 2009;32(1):58–75. doi: 10.1097/01.FCH.0000342817.95390.7e. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khoo K, Bolt P, Babl FE, Jury S, Goldman RD. Health information seeking by parents in the Internet age. J Paediatr Child Health. 2008;44(7/8):419–423. - PubMed
    1. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Munoz JA, Puyol J-A, Lara M, Watkins KE, Yang H, Mcglynn EA. Health Information on the Internet: Accessibility, Quality, and Readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001;285(20):2612–2621. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.20.2612. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kummervold PE, Gammon D, Bergvik S, Johnsen JAK, Hasvold T, Rosenvinge JH. Social support in a wired world: Use of online mental health forums in Norway. Nord J Psychiatry. 2002;56(1):59–65. doi: 10.1080/08039480252803945. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources