Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 May 16:7:300.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-300.

Comparison of performance of Sri Lankan and US children on cognitive and motor scales of the Bayley scales of infant development

Pavithra Godamunne  1 , Chathurika Liyanage, Nalin Wimaladharmasooriya, Arunasalem Pathmeswaran, Ananda Rajitha Wickremasinghe, Cryshelle Patterson, Nalini Sathiakumar
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of performance of Sri Lankan and US children on cognitive and motor scales of the Bayley scales of infant development

Pavithra Godamunne et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: There is no validated scale to assess neurodevelopment of infants and children in Sri Lanka. The Bayley III scales have used widely globally but it has not been validated for Sri Lankan children. We administered the Cognitive and Motor Scales of the Bayley III to 150 full-term children aged 6, 12 and 24 months from the Gampaha District of Sri Lanka. We compared the performance of Sri Lankan children 6, 12 and 24 months of age on the cognitive and motor scales of the Bayley III with that of US children.

Results: Compared to the US norms, at 12 months, Sri Lankan children had significantly higher cognitive scores and lower gross motor scores, and at 24 months significantly lower cognitive scores. The test had a high test-retest reliability among Sri Lankan children.

Conclusions: There were small differences in the cognitive and motors scores between Sri Lankan and US children. It is feasible to use Bayley III scales to assess neurodevelopment of Sri Lankan children. However, we recommend that the tool be validated using a larger representative sample of all population groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Perera H, Weerasinghe D, De Silva YIP, Weliwatte P, Dharmalatha HNK. Outcome of early intervention in infants at risk of developmental delay: a pilot study. Sri Lanka J Child Health. 2007;36:48–52.
    1. Glascoe FP, Byrne KE, Ashford LG, Johnson KL, Chang B, Strickland B. Accuracy of the denver-ii in developmental screening. Pediatrics. 1992;89(6):1221–1225. - PubMed
    1. Hamilton S. Screening for developmental delay: reliable, easy-to-use tools. J Fam Pract. 2006;55(5):415–42. - PubMed
    1. Wu Y, Tsou K, Hsu C, Fang L, Yao G, Yao G, Jeng S. Taiwanese infants’ mental and motor development - 6–24 months. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008;33(1):102–108. - PubMed
    1. Santos DCC, Gabbard C, Gonclaves VMG. Motor development during the first year: A comparative study. J Genet Psychol. 2001;162(2):143–153. doi: 10.1080/00221320109597956. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types