Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr 16;105(2):e146-9.
doi: 10.17269/cjph.105.4143.

Non-medical prescription opioid use, prescription opioid-related harms and public health in Canada: an update 5 years later

Affiliations

Non-medical prescription opioid use, prescription opioid-related harms and public health in Canada: an update 5 years later

Benedikt Fischer et al. Can J Public Health. .

Abstract

Five years ago, we highlighted Canada's emerging problem of prescription opioid (PO)-related harms and emphasized the need for targeted surveillance, research and interventions. Overall levels of PO use in the Canadian population have grown by 70% since then, while at the same time levels of non-medical PO use (NMPOU) in general and in key risk populations have continued to be high; furthermore, PO-related harms - specifically morbidity (e.g., treatment admissions) and mortality (e.g., overdose deaths) - have risen substantively. Unfortunately, major knowledge gaps related to systematic monitoring of PO-related harms continue to exist; for example, no national morbidity or mortality statistics are available. Investigator-driven research has generated important insights into the epidemiology and impacts of PO-related harms: high correlations between population-level PO dispensing and/or PO dosing and harms; high rates of co-occurrence of NMPOU and co-morbidities; and distinct NMPOU-related risk dynamics among street drug users. Select policy measures have been implemented only recently at the federal and provincial levels; these interventions remain to be systematically evaluated, especially given preliminary indications of reductions in PO-related harms (e.g., NMPOU) unfolding prior to the interventions. For these purposes, improvements in surveillance tools and research resources devoted to the extensive public health problem of PO-related harms in Canada continue to be urgently needed.

Il y a cinq ans, nous avions souligné l’émergence de méfaits liés aux opioïdes sur ordonnance (OSO) au Canada et le besoin de mener des études et des interventions de surveillance ciblées. Depuis, les niveaux globaux de consommation d’OSO ont augmenté de 70 %, selon des données (provinciales) limitées, tandis que simultanément, les niveaux de consommation d’OSO à des fins non médicales (COSONM) en général et dans les principales populations à risque ont continué d’être élevés, et les méfaits liés aux OSO — spécifiquement la morbidité (les admissions pour traitement) et la mortalité (les décès par surdose) — ont considérablement augmenté. Malheureusement, il existe encore des lacunes majeures dans la surveillance systématique des méfaits liés aux OSO; à titre d’exemple, les statistiques nationales de morbidité ou de mortalité n’existent pas. La recherche menée à l’initiative des chercheurs eux-mêmes a apporté un éclairage utile sur l’épidémiologie et l’impact des méfaits liés aux OSO: corrélations élevées entre la délivrance et/ou le dosage des OSO et leurs méfaits dans la population; taux élevés de concomitance entre la COSONM et les comorbidités; et dynamique du risque distincte liée à la COSONM chez les utilisateurs de drogues de rue. Certaines mesures n’ont été appliquées que récemment aux paliers fédéral et provincial; ces interventions ne sont pas encore systématiquement évaluées mais devraient l’être, surtout que selon les indications préliminaires, la réduction des méfaits liés aux OSO (dont la COSONM) a commencé avant les interventions. Il existe donc toujours un besoin urgent d’améliorer les outils de surveillance et les ressources de recherche consacrés au vaste problème de santé publique des méfaits liés aux OSO au Canada.

Keywords: Canada; Prescription opioids; harms; non-medical use; policy; public health; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fischer B, Rehm J, Goldman B, Popova S. Non-medical use of prescription opioids and public health in Canada: An urgent call for research and interventions development. Can J Public Health. 2008;99(3):182–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Narcotics Control Board. Narcotic Drugs Technical Report: Estimated World Requirements for 2013 — Statistics for 2011. New York, NY: United Nations; 2013.
    1. Fischer B, Ialomiteanu A, Boak A, Adlaf E, Rehm J, Mann R. Prevalence and key covariates of non-medical prescription opioid use among the general secondary student and adult populations in Ontario, Canada. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2013;32(3):276–87. doi: 10.1111/dar.12025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brands B, Paglia-Boak A, Sproule BA, Leslie K, Adlaf EM. Nonmedical use of opioid analgesics among Ontario students. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(3):256–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada. I-Track: Enhanced Surveillance of Risk Behaviours Among People Who Inject Drugs — Phase I Report. Ottawa, ON: Surveillance and Risk Assessment Division, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Public Health Agency of Canada; 2006.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances