Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 May 10:22:31.
doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-22-31.

Effectiveness of a simplified cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program for the non-medical staff of a university hospital

Affiliations
Observational Study

Effectiveness of a simplified cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program for the non-medical staff of a university hospital

Tomoya Hirose et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: The 2010 Consensus on Science and Treatment Recommendations Statement recommended that short video/computer self-instruction courses, with minimal or no instructor coaching, combined with hands-on practice can be considered an effective alternative to instructor-led basic life support courses. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a simplified cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training program for non-medical staff working at a university hospital.

Methods: Before and immediately after a 45-min CPR training program consisting of instruction on chest compression and automated external defibrillator (AED) use with a personal training manikin, CPR skills were automatically recorded and evaluated. Participants' attitudes towards CPR were evaluated by a questionnaire survey.

Results: From September 2011 through March 2013, 161 participants attended the program. We evaluated chest compression technique in 109 of these participants. The number of chest compressions delivered after the program versus that before was significantly greater (110.8 ± 13.0/min vs 94.2 ± 27.4/min, p < 0.0001), interruption of chest compressions was significantly shorter (0.05 ± 0.34 sec/30 sec vs 0.89 ± 3.52 sec/30 sec, p < 0.05), mean depth of chest compressions was significantly greater (57.6 ± 6.8 mm vs 52.2 ± 9.4 mm, p < 0.0001), and the proportion of incomplete chest compressions of <5 cm among all chest compressions was significantly decreased (8.9 ± 23.2% vs 38.6 ± 42.9%, p < 0.0001). Of the 159 participants who responded to the questionnaire survey after the program, the proportion of participants who answered 'I can check for a response,' 'I can perform chest compressions,' and 'I can absolutely or I think I can use an AED' increased versus that before the program (81.8% vs 19.5%, 77.4% vs 10.1%, 84.3% vs 23.3%, respectively).

Conclusions: A 45-min simplified CPR training program on chest compression and AED use improved CPR quality and the attitude towards CPR and AED use of non-medical staff of a university hospital.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The personal training kit. (A) The CPR Training Box APPA-KUN®. (B) The CPR skill report system APPA-KUN Pro®.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The classroom scene of the simplified cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program with personal training kit.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills for all participants before and immediately after the simplified CPR training program. (A) Number of chest compressions, (B) time chest compressions were interrupted, (C) mean depth of chest compressions, and (D) proportion of incomplete chest compressions of <5 cm among all chest compressions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills according to first- and second-time attendance of the participants. (A) Number of chest compressions, (B) time chest compressions were interrupted, (C) mean depth of chest compressions, and (D) proportion of incomplete chest compressions of <5 cm among all chest compressions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Skogvoll E, Nordseth T. The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: shock or CPR? A population based prospective study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2008;16:11. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-16-11. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, Weisfeldt M, Travers A, Christenson J, McBurnie MA, Zalenski R, Becker LB, Schron EB, Proschan M. Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. New Engl J Med. 2004;351:637–646. - PubMed
    1. DeVita MA, Braithwaite RS, Mahidhara R, Stuart S, Foraida M, Simmons RL. Use of medical emergency team responses to reduce hospital cardiopulmonary arrests. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:251–254. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.006585. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buist MD, Moore GE, Bernard SA, Waxman BP, Anderson JN, Nguyen TV. Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study. BMJ. 2002;324:387–390. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hazinski MF, Nolan JP, Billi JE, Bottiger BW, Bossaert L, De Caen AR, Deakin CD, Drajer S, Eigel B, Hickey RW, Jacobs I, Kleinman ME, Kloeck W, Koster RW, Lim SH, Mancini ME, Montgomery WH, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, Nadkarni VM, O'Connor RE, Okada K, Perlman JM, Sayre MR, Shuster M, Soar J, Sunde K, Travers AH, Wyllie J, Zideman D. Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010;122:S250–S275. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970897. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types