Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Jul;12(3):410-5.
doi: 10.2450/2014.0167-13. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

The importance of antenatal prevention of RhD immunisation in the first pregnancy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The importance of antenatal prevention of RhD immunisation in the first pregnancy

Slavica Dajak et al. Blood Transfus. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to examine which pregnancies are associated with RhD immunisation and haemolytic disease of foetus and newborn (HDFN) when postnatal RhD prophylaxis is applied.

Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study included pregnancies with RhD immunisation; each of the pregnant women received anti-D immunoglobulin after delivery, miscarriage or invasive antenatal diagnostic procedures. For each pregnancy we analysed the order of pregnancy that caused immunisation as well as the order of the monitored pregnancy and whether the anti-D antibodies caused HDFN.

Results: Anti-D antibody was detected in 1.2% of RhD-negative pregnancies. Out of 89 monitored pregnancies, 56 (63%) were immunised by the first pregnancy, 21 (24%) by the second one, and 12 (13%) by subsequent pregnancies. HDFN occurred in 28 cases; 25 of them were the consequence of the immunisation in the first pregnancy. The most severe cases of HDFN, perinatal death (n=2) and intrauterine transfusion (n=7) were consequence of immunisation during the first pregnancy. Significantly more cases of HDFN were caused by immunisation in the first pregnancy than by immunisation in subsequent pregnancies (χ(2)=12, p<0.01).

Conclusion: RhD immunisation could be reduced in more than half cases by administering anti-D immunoglobulin at the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy, especially the first pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klein H, Anstee D. London: Blackwell Science, editor. Mollison’s Blood Transfusion in Clinical Medicine. 2005. Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn; pp. 496–545.
    1. Bowman JM. RhD hemolytic disease of the newborn. N Engl J Med. 1998;334:1775–7. - PubMed
    1. Kumpel BM. On the immunologic basis of Rh immuneglobulin (anti-D) prophylaxis. Transfusion. 2006;46:1652–6. - PubMed
    1. Crowther CA, Keirse MJ. Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing rhesus alloimunization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000020. - PubMed
    1. Fung Kee Fung K, Eason E, Crane J, et al. Prevention of Rh alloimunization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:765–73. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms