Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease--reply

Affiliations

¹ Department of Cardiology, Acibadem University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey2Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

Comment

Ilke Sipahi. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun.

. 2014 Jun;174(6):1007-8.

doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.762.

¹ Department of Cardiology, Acibadem University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey2Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

No abstract available

Comment on

Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era.
Sipahi I, Akay MH, Dagdelen S, Blitz A, Alhan C. Sipahi I, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):223-30. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12844. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24296767 Review.
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease.
Takagi H, Umemoto T; ALICE Group. Takagi H, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):1006-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.773. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24887761 No abstract available.
Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease.
Rodriguez AE, Fernandez-Pereira C, Mieres J. Rodriguez AE, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun;174(6):1007. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.776. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24887763 No abstract available.