Treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy: an update
- PMID: 24887986
- DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000073
Treatment of Hymenoptera venom allergy: an update
Abstract
Purpose of review: To review and summarize the studies published between 2012 and 2014 about the use of venom immunotherapy (VIT) to treat Hymenoptera hypersensitivity.
Recent findings: Several studies reconfirm the effectiveness of VIT in both children and adults, and provide a better understanding of its immune-modulating effects. There are concerns about its cost-effectiveness; however, VIT versus self-injectable epinephrine alone when stung is the preferred treatment of choice for affected individuals when quality-of-life issues are considered. Ultrarush VIT may be as effective in children as in adults but is associated with a high risk of systemic allergic reactions (SARs). Controversy continues about the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and their potential for increased SARs while on VIT. Individuals with mast cell disorders, female sex, honeybee allergy, and those receiving rush or ultrarush VITs are at higher risk for SARs. Elevated baseline serum tryptase levels greater than 20 μg/l, SARs during VIT, and honeybee sensitivity are risk factors for VIT failure.
Summary: VIT remains the gold standard to treat Hymenoptera-allergic individuals to prevent future sting-induced SARs in both children and adults.
Similar articles
-
When can immunotherapy for insect sting allergy be stopped?J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):324-8; quiz 329-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.11.018. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015. PMID: 25956311 Review.
-
Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy and field stings.J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006;16(4):224-31. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006. PMID: 16889279
-
Old Questions, new answers: real-world long-term efficiency of hymenoptera venom immunotherapy: prevalance of venom-induced anaphylaxis, risk factors, and field sting reactions.Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2025 Mar 1;53(2):82-88. doi: 10.15586/aei.v53i2.1237. eCollection 2025. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2025. PMID: 40088026
-
Safety of Ultrarush Venom Immunotherapy: Comparison Between Children and Adults.J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2016;26(1):40-7. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2016. PMID: 27012015
-
Clinical aspects of hymenoptera venom allergy and venom immunotherapy.Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Nov;51(6):244-258. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.113. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019. PMID: 31594296 Review.
Cited by
-
Honey bee venom re-challenge during specific immunotherapy: prolonged cardio-pulmonary resuscitation allowed survival in a case of near fatal anaphylaxis.Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun 2;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13223-022-00687-x. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2022. PMID: 35655287 Free PMC article.
-
Which immunotherapy product is better for patients allergic to Polistes venom? A laboratory and clinical study.PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180270. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28686638 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and tolerability of venom immunotherapy: Evaluation of 581 rush- and ultra-rush induction protocols (safety of rush and ultra-rush venom immunotherapy).World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Dec 15;14(1):100496. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100496. eCollection 2021 Jan. World Allergy Organ J. 2020. PMID: 33376576 Free PMC article.
-
New Biomarkers of Hymenoptera Venom Allergy in a Group of Inflammation Factors.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 11;18(8):4011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084011. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33920429 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective adherence to specific immunotherapy in Europe (PASTE) survey protocol.Clin Transl Allergy. 2015 Apr 27;5:17. doi: 10.1186/s13601-015-0060-0. eCollection 2015. Clin Transl Allergy. 2015. PMID: 25918637 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous