Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;33(6):1032-9.
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1246.

Ending SNAP subsidies for sugar-sweetened beverages could reduce obesity and type 2 diabetes

Sanjay Basu  1 , Hilary Kessler Seligman  2 , Christopher Gardner  3 , Jay Bhattacharya  4
Affiliations

Ending SNAP subsidies for sugar-sweetened beverages could reduce obesity and type 2 diabetes

Sanjay Basu et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jun.

Abstract

To reduce obesity and type 2 diabetes rates, lawmakers have proposed modifying Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to encourage healthier food choices. We examined the impact of two proposed policies: a ban on using SNAP dollars to buy sugar-sweetened beverages; and a subsidy in which for every SNAP dollar spent on fruit and vegetables, thirty cents is credited back to participants' SNAP benefit cards. We used nationally representative data and models describing obesity, type 2 diabetes, and determinants of food consumption among a sample of over 19,000 SNAP participants. We found that a ban on SNAP purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages would be expected to significantly reduce obesity prevalence and type 2 diabetes incidence, particularly among adults ages 18-65 and some racial and ethnic minorities. The subsidy policy would not be expected to have a significant effect on obesity and type 2 diabetes, given available data. Such a subsidy could, however, more than double the proportion of SNAP participants who meet federal vegetable and fruit consumption guidelines.

Keywords: Determinants Of Health; Public Health; Safety-Net Systems; Special Populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Coleman-Jensen A, Nord M,Andrews M, Carlson S. Household food security in the United States in 2011. Washington (DC): Department of Agriculture; 2012.
    1. Leung CW, Willett WC, Ding EL. Low-income Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation is related to adiposity and metabolic risk factors. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 95(1):17–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leung CW, Ding EL, Catalano PJ, Villamor E, Rimm EB, Willett WC. Dietary intake and dietary quality of low-income adults in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(5): 977–88. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shenkin JD, Jacobson MF. Using the Food Stamp Program and other methods to promote healthy diets for low-income consumers. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(9):1562–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faulkner GE, Grootendorst P, Nguyen VH, Andreyeva T, Arbour-Nicitopoulos K, Auld MC, et al. Economic instruments for obesity prevention: results of a scoping review and modified Delphi survey. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:109. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances