Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jun;92(2):319-50.
doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12060.

What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation

Antoine Boivin  1 , Pascale Lehoux, Jako Burgers, Richard Grol
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation

Antoine Boivin et al. Milbank Q. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Context: In the past 50 years, individual patient involvement at the clinical consultation level has received considerable attention. More recently, patients and the public have increasingly been involved in collective decisions concerning the improvement of health care and policymaking. However, rigorous evaluation guiding the development and implementation of effective public involvement interventions is lacking. This article describes those key ingredients likely to affect public members' ability to deliberate productively with professionals and influence collective health care choices.

Method: We conducted a trial process evaluation of public involvement in setting priorities for health care improvement. In all, 172 participants (including 83 patients and public members and 89 professionals) from 6 Health and Social Services Centers in Canada participated in the trial. We video-recorded 14 one-day meetings, and 2 nonparticipant observers took structured notes. Using qualitative analysis, we show how public members influenced health care improvement priorities.

Findings: Legitimacy, credibility, and power explain the variations in the public members' influence. Their credibility was supported by their personal experience as patients and caregivers, the provision of a structured preparation meeting, and access to population-based data from their community. Legitimacy was fostered by the recruitment of a balanced group of participants and by the public members' opportunities to draw from one another's experience. The combination of small-group deliberations, wider public consultation, and a moderation style focused on effective group process helped level out the power differences between professionals and the public. The engagement of key stakeholders in the intervention design and implementation helped build policy support for public involvement.

Conclusions: A number of interacting active ingredients structure and foster the public's legitimacy, credibility, and power. By paying greater attention to them, policymakers could develop and implement more effective public involvement interventions.

Keywords: patient participation; policymaking; qualitative research; quality of health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key Components of a Public Involvement Intervention
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Balint M. The Doctor, His Patient and the Illness. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 1964.
    1. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–136. May 8. - PubMed
    1. Stewart RE, Vroegop S, Kamps GB, van der Werf GT, Meyboom-de Jong B. Factors influencing adherence to guidelines in general practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(3):546–554. Summer. - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002;288(14):1775–1779. - PubMed
    1. Coulter A. Do patients want a choice and does it work. BMJ. 2010;341:c4989. - PubMed

Publication types