Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- PMID: 24890986
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.033
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Abstract
This study sought to investigate the relative safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and in those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The safety of bivalirudin in PCI, particularly in patients with STEMI, continues to be debated. We searched the on-line databases for randomized controlled trials of bivalirudin versus heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Data on study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample characteristics, and clinical outcomes at 30 days were extracted. A total of 19,856 PCI patients included in 7 randomized trials and 5,820 patients with STEMI included in 2 randomized trials were separately analyzed. At 30 days, bivalirudin use in patients undergoing PCI resulted in similar rates of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis. In patients with STEMI, bivalirudin use resulted in decreased cardiac mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 0.97, p=0.03) compared with heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors but an increase in definite stent thrombosis at 30 days (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.24, p=0.02) driven by an increase in acute stent thrombosis (RR 5.48, 95% CI 2.30 to 13.07, p=0.0001). Bivalirudin use was associated with a decrease in Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74, p<0.0001) and TIMI minor (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.63, p<0.0001) bleeding rates in PCI patients as well as in a subgroup of patients with STEMI. In conclusion, in PCI patients anticoagulation with bivalirudin results in similar ischemic adverse events and a reduction in TIMI major and minor bleeding at 30 days compared with heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In patients with STEMI, bivalirudin use is associated with a reduction in TIMI major and minor bleeding and fewer deaths from cardiac causes but an increase in acute and 30-day definite stent thrombosis.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Bivalirudin versus heparin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: pooled patient-level analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI and EUROMAX trials.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jan 6;65(1):27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.029. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25572507
-
Anticoagulant therapy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of stents and P2Y12 inhibitors.BMJ. 2014 Nov 11;349:g6419. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6419. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 25389143 Free PMC article.
-
Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction.N Engl J Med. 2008 May 22;358(21):2218-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708191. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18499566 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing an invasive strategy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Int J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 3;152(3):369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Sep 16. Int J Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 20843568 Review.
-
Short- and long-term outcomes in diabetes patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin compared with heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIA inhibitors: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;86(3):364-75. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25952. Epub 2015 Apr 24. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 25914388 Review.
Cited by
-
Extravascular compared to Intravascular Femoral Closure is Associated with Less Bleeding and Similar MACE after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Int J Med Sci. 2019 Jan 1;16(1):43-50. doi: 10.7150/ijms.29253. eCollection 2019. Int J Med Sci. 2019. PMID: 30662327 Free PMC article.
-
Design and Rationale of the Femoral Closure versus Radial Compression Devices Related to Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (FERARI) Study.Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2015 Nov 3;9:97-103. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S31932. eCollection 2015. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26568686 Free PMC article.
-
Antiplatelet Therapy During PCI for Patients with Stable Angina and Atrial Fibrillation.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Aug;17(8):64. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0615-7. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015. PMID: 26104508 Review.
-
Differences of bleedings after percutaneous coronary intervention using femoral closure and radial compression devices.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(20):e15501. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015501. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31096450 Free PMC article.
-
Critical Appraisal of Bivalirudin versus Heparin for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0127832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127832. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26010682 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous