Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Sep;35(9):8867-74.
doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2154-z. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

Comparison of ERCP, EUS, and ERCP combined with EUS in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Comparison of ERCP, EUS, and ERCP combined with EUS in diagnosing pancreatic neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hongyu Li et al. Tumour Biol. 2014 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

In the current study, we performed a systematic review of literature pertaining to the diagnostic value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and combined ERCP plus EUS to pancreatic cancer. We searched MEDLINE, OVID, and the Cochrane Library for studies evaluating diagnostic validity of ERCP, EUS, and ERCP plus EUS between January 1989 and May 2014. We obtained pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC). A total of 10 studies that included 669 patients who fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria were considered for inclusion in the analysis. The pooled sensitivities of EUS, ERCP, and EUS plus ERCP were 76.7, 57.9, and 79.9 %, respectively. The pooled specificities were 91.7, 90.6, and 94.2 %, respectively. The *Q index estimates were 0.828, 0.862, and 0.896, respectively. The *Q indices for EUS and EUS plus ERCP were significantly higher compared with ERCP (P = 0.010 and 0.008, respectively). Our meta-analysis showed that ERCP plus EUS was associated with a high diagnostic value for the detection of pancreatic neoplasms compared with ERCP and EUS alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Nov;58(5):690-5 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Mar 20;134(6):459-64 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Apr 5;142(7):590; author reply 590-1 - PubMed
    1. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008 Apr;34(4):525-32 - PubMed
    1. Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2893-917 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources