Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Sep;39(8):783-808.
doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu029. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of distraction and hypnosis for needle-related pain and distress in children and adolescents

Kathryn A Birnie  1 , Melanie Noel  2 , Jennifer A Parker  2 , Christine T Chambers  3 , Lindsay S Uman  4 , Steve R Kisely  2 , Patrick J McGrath  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review and meta-analysis of distraction and hypnosis for needle-related pain and distress in children and adolescents

Kathryn A Birnie et al. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the evidence (and quality) for distraction and hypnosis for needle-related pain and distress in children and adolescents. To explore the effects of distraction characteristics (e.g., adult involvement, type of distracter), child age, and study risk of bias on treatment efficacy.

Methods: 26 distraction and 7 hypnosis trials were included and self-report, observer-report, and behavioral pain intensity and distress examined. Distraction studies were coded for 4 intervention characteristics, and all studies coded for child age and study risk of bias.

Results: Findings showed strong support for distraction and hypnosis for reducing pain and distress from needle procedures. The quality of available evidence was low, however. Characteristics of distraction interventions, child age, and study risk of bias showed some influence on treatment efficacy.

Conclusions: Distraction and hypnosis are efficacious in reducing needle-related pain and distress in children. The quality of trials in this area needs to be improved.

Keywords: distraction; distress; empirically supported treatments; hypnosis; needles; pain; randomized controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of risk of bias across all included distraction studies.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Summary of risk of bias across all included hypnosis studies.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Forest plot of studies examining distraction for self-reported pain.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Accardi M C, Milling L S. The effectiveness of hypnosis for reducing procedure-related pain in children and adolescents: A comprehensive methodological review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2009;32:328–339. - PubMed
    1. Altman D G, Schulz K F, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche P C, Lang T CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001;134:663–694. - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics. American academy of pediatrics. 2013 Retrieved from www.aap.org. Retrieved October 8, 2013.
    1. Balan R, Bavdekar S B, Jadhav S. Can Indian classical instrumental music reduce pain felt during venepuncture? Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2009;76:469–473. - PubMed
    1. Bellieni C V, Cordelli D M, Raffaelli M, Ricci B, Morgese G, Buonocore G. Analgesic effect of watching TV during venipuncture. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2006;91:1015–1017. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types