Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;17(6):346-52.
doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0207.

Virtual reality as a distraction technique in chronic pain patients

Affiliations

Virtual reality as a distraction technique in chronic pain patients

Brenda K Wiederhold et al. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

We explored the use of virtual reality distraction techniques for use as adjunctive therapy to treat chronic pain. Virtual environments were specifically created to provide pleasant and engaging experiences where patients navigated on their own through rich and varied simulated worlds. Real-time physiological monitoring was used as a guide to determine the effectiveness and sustainability of this intervention. Human factors studies showed that virtual navigation is a safe and effective method for use with chronic pain patients. Chronic pain patients demonstrated significant relief in subjective ratings of pain that corresponded to objective measurements in peripheral, noninvasive physiological measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
The scales of sense of being in the virtual reality (VR) simulated environment—Ease of use, Immersive, and Interactive effects on a scale from 1 to 7, where 7 represents the normal experience of being in a place. 1=“not at all,” 7=“very much.” VR environment was easy to use, interactive, immersive, and real.
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
The scales of sense of being in the VR—how real was VR versus the simulated environment, similarities between the simulated environment and the actual places patients visited, how focused on the tasks patients were during the simulated environment, on a scale from 1 to 7, where 7 represents the normal experience of being in a place. 1=“not at all,” 7=“very much.” VR was immersive and real.
<b>FIG. 3.</b>
FIG. 3.
Sickness exploration questionnaire scores in terms of general discomfort, fatigue, headache, eyestrain, and nausea, their mean scales are all <1.5, where the scales range from 0 to 3. 0=“Absent,” 3=“Severe.” No serious side effects were observed. It was determined that VR was indeed safe to use with this population.
<b>FIG. 4.</b>
FIG. 4.
Comparison of subjective pain ratings.
<b>FIG. 5.</b>
FIG. 5.
Comparison of objective pain ratings.
<b>FIG. 6.</b>
FIG. 6.
Comparison of reported pain intensity.
<b>FIG. 7.</b>
FIG. 7.
Comparison of heart rate.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brody JE. (2006) Let's get serious about relieving chronic pain. The New York Times, Jan. 6, 2006. www.nytimes.com/2006/01/10/health/10brod.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 (accessed Mar. 23, 2014)
    1. Hoffman HG. (2004) Virtual-reality therapy. Scientific American. www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/vrpain/index_files/SCIAMFin.pdf (accessed Mar. 22, 2014) - PubMed
    1. Hoffman HG, Patterson DR, Carrougher GJ. Use of virtual reality for adjunctive treatment of adult burn pain during physical therapy. Clinical Journal of Pain 2000; 17:229–235 - PubMed
    1. Schneider SM, Workman ML. Effects of virtual reality on symptom distress in children receiving chemotherapy. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1999; 2:125–134 - PubMed
    1. Schneider SM. (2003) Virtual reality for the treatment of breast cancer. CyberTherapy. San Diego, CA: Interactive Media Institute

Publication types