Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May 8;15(3):4708.
doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4708.

A Monte Carlo evaluation of beam characteristics for total body irradiation at extended treatment distances

Affiliations

A Monte Carlo evaluation of beam characteristics for total body irradiation at extended treatment distances

Roumiana Chakarova et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. .

Abstract

The aim is to study beam characteristics at large distances when focusing on the electron component. In particular, to investigate the utility of spoilers with various thicknesses as an electron source, as well as the effect of different spoiler-to-surface distances (STSD) on the beam characteristics and, consequently, on the dose in the superficial region. A MC model of a 15 MV Varian accelerator, validated earlier by experimental data at isocenter and extended distances used in large-field total body irradiation, is applied to evaluate beam characteristics at distances larger than 400 cm. Calculations are carried out using BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc code packages and phase space data are analyzed by the beam data processor BEAMdp. The electron component of the beam is analyzed at isocenter and extended distances, with and without spoilers as beam modifiers, assuming vacuum or air surrounding the accelerator head. Spoiler thickness of 1.6 cm is found to be optimal compared to thicknesses of 0.8 cm and 2.4 cm. The STSD variations should be taken into account when treating patients, in particular when the treatment protocols are based on a fixed distance to the patient central sagittal plane, and also, in order to maintain high dose in the superficial region.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cross profiles in water for 10×10cm2, 20×20cm2, and 40×40cm2 fields at SSD=90cm. Lines: measured data; symbols: MC data.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MC geometry for calculation of central depth dose profile for different spoiler‐to‐surface distances (STSD). Phase space is produced at 445 cm from the accelerator target. Source‐to‐water surface distance is fixed to 480 cm; STSD varies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Characteristics of the electron component of the beam (estimated real fluence) at (a) SSD=90cm and (b) SSD=445cm. Black histograms: vacuum surrounding the accelerator head; red histograms : air surrounding the accelerator head; green histogram: air surrounding the accelerator head and presence of 1.6 cm PMMA spoiler.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Angular distribution of the electron component of the beam. Black histogram: vacuum surrounding the accelerator head, SSD=90cm; red histogram: vacuum surrounding the accelerator head, SSD=445cm; green histogram: air surrounding the accelerator head, SSD=90cm; blue histogram: air surrounding accelerator head, SSD=445cm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Energy fluence distribution (a) of electrons at 445 cm distance (black histogram: without spoiler; red histogram: 0.8 cm PMMA spoiler; green histogram: 1.6 cm PMMA spoiler; blue histogram: 2.4 cm PMMA spoiler); (b) depth dose distribution of electrons at 445 cm distance (black line: without spoiler; red line: 0.8 cm MMA spoiler; green line: 1.6 cm PMMA spoiler; blue line: 2.4 cm PMMA spoiler).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Depth dose distributions in water at SSD=480cm behind 1.6 cm PMMA spoiler (red circles: STSD=5cm; blue squares: STSD=10cm, black triangles: STSD=30cm).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Energy fluence distribution for electrons at 480 cm distance behind 1.6 cm PMMA; black, red, and green lines for STSD=5, 10, and 30 cm, correspondingly.

Similar articles

References

    1. AAPM . The physical aspects of total and half body photon irradiation. AAPM report 17. A report of Task Group 29 Radiation Therapy Commlttee. Philidelphia, PA: American Institute of Physics; 1986.
    1. Podgorsak EB and Podgorsak MA. Special procedures and techniques in radiotherapy. In: Podgorsak EB, techical editor. Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2005.
    1. Total body irridation. In: Khan FM, editor. The physics of radiation therapy, 4th edition Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
    1. Gilson D and Taylor RE. Total body irradiation. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:1201–03. - PubMed
    1. Kassaee A, Xiao Y, Bloch P, Goldwein J, Rosenthal DI, Bjärngard BE. Doses near the surface during total‐body irradiation with 15 MV X‐rays. Int J Cancer. 2001;96 (S1):125–30. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources