A further study of choice and percentage reinforcement
- PMID: 24897575
- DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(85)90040-3
A further study of choice and percentage reinforcement
Abstract
In Experiment I four pigeons were trained in a concurrent chains procedure with fixed-ratio schedules (FR1) in the initial components and fixed-time schedules in the terminal components. Pecking one of the keys when both keys were white initiated a fixed time schedule on that key. A peck to the left key produced three stripes on the key. At the termination of the fixed-time component food always occurred. Pecking the other key produced either a circle or a triangle. If a circle appeared, reinforcement occurred. If a triangle appeared a brief timeout was given. Initially the stripes appeared on the left key and the circle and triangle on the left. This was reversed during the course of the experiment. In addition, sessions were conducted in which both circle and triangle sometimes preceded reinforcement and sometimes timeout. For most birds under most conditions there was a preference for the key that produced the circle and triangle. When these were uncorrelated with reinforcement and time out three of the birds preferred the key producing 100% reinforcement. In Experiment II three factors were varied and VI 20 sec schedules were used in the initial links instead of FR1. The results showed that pigeons preferred the 50% condition more 1) the greater the duration of the terminal links, 2) the smaller the value on the initial link VI schedules and 3) the less the probability of food in the terminal link with stripes on the key.
Copyright © 1985. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Psychological distance to reward: equating the number of stimulus and response segments.Behav Processes. 2004 May 31;66(2):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.01.003. Behav Processes. 2004. PMID: 15110910
-
Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jan;45(1):33-45. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-33. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986. PMID: 16812442 Free PMC article.
-
Preference for intermittent reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):463-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-463. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974. PMID: 16811758 Free PMC article.
-
Reinforcement omission in concurrent fixed-interval and random-interval schedules.Behav Processes. 2007 Mar;74(3):334-41. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.12.004. Epub 2006 Dec 20. Behav Processes. 2007. PMID: 17275211
-
Reprint of "Acquisition of choice in concurrent chains: Assessing the cumulative decision model".Behav Processes. 2016 Jun;127:74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 May 4. Behav Processes. 2016. PMID: 27150444 Review.
Cited by
-
The Relevance of Operant Behavior in Conceptualizing the Psychological Well-Being of Captive Animals.Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Aug 10;43(3):617-654. doi: 10.1007/s40614-020-00259-7. eCollection 2020 Sep. Perspect Behav Sci. 2020. PMID: 33029580 Free PMC article.
-
How suboptimal is suboptimal choice?J Exp Anal Behav. 2017 Jan;107(1):136-150. doi: 10.1002/jeab.239. J Exp Anal Behav. 2017. PMID: 28101923 Free PMC article.
-
Signaled and unsignaled terminal links in concurrent chains I: effects of reinforcer probability and immediacy.J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):327-52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-327. J Exp Anal Behav. 2010. PMID: 21541175 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources