Cancer patients' perceptions regarding the value of the physical examination: a survey study
- PMID: 24899511
- PMCID: PMC5841459
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28680
Cancer patients' perceptions regarding the value of the physical examination: a survey study
Abstract
Background: Despite its clinical utility, progressive reliance on technology can lead to devaluing the physical examination in patients with advanced cancer. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether these patients have a positive or negative perception of the physical examination. A secondary objective was to determine whether these perceptions are related to interpersonal/relational values (symbolic) or diagnostic/objective values (pragmatic).
Methods: One hundred fifty patients with cancer who were receiving concurrent oncology and palliative care were administered a 26-item survey regarding their overall perception of the physical examination. The primary outcome-patient responses to "In the last 3 months, I believe my experience while being examined has been overall: very negative (a score of -5) to very positive (a score of +5),"-was analyzed using the Sign test. Other items were predefined as either symbolic or pragmatic statements, and patient responses from strongly disagree (a score of 1) to strongly agree (a score of 5) were further analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for associations between baseline characteristics and the primary outcome.
Results: Most patients (83%) indicated that the overall experience of being examined was highly positive (median score, 4; interquartile range [IQR], 2-5; P ≤ .0001). Patients valued both the pragmatic aspects (median score, 5; IQR, 4-5) and symbolic aspects (median score, 4; IQR, 4-5) of the physical examination. Increasing age was independently associated with a more positive perception of the physical examination (odds ratio, 1.07 per year; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.12 per year; P = .01).
Conclusions: Patients with advanced cancer indicate that the physical examination is a highly positive aspect of their care. These benefits are perceived as having both symbolic and pragmatic value. The physical examination should remain a cornerstone of clinical encounters.
Keywords: patient acceptance of health care; patient satisfaction; patient-centered care; physical examination; physician-patient communication.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclaimers: No financial disclosures or conflicts of interest from any authors.
Figures
Comment in
-
Do patients with advanced cancer value the physical examination?Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;120(14):2077-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28678. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24899355 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Do patients with advanced cancer value the physical examination?Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;120(14):2077-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28678. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24899355 No abstract available.
-
Patient's perceptions of physical examination in the setting of chronic pain.Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Feb;190(1):313-316. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02250-2. Epub 2020 May 25. Ir J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 32451763
-
Barriers against psychosocial communication: oncologists' perceptions.J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 20;31(30):3815-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.1609. Epub 2013 Sep 16. J Clin Oncol. 2013. PMID: 24043746
-
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32483832 Free PMC article.
-
Reclaiming the Bedside of the Vascular Patient.Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Apr;101:6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.006. Epub 2023 Dec 19. Ann Vasc Surg. 2024. PMID: 38122971 Review.
Cited by
-
Pandemic palliative care: beyond ventilators and saving lives.CMAJ. 2020 Apr 14;192(15):E400-E404. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200465. Epub 2020 Mar 31. CMAJ. 2020. PMID: 32234725 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Hypnotic Intervention for Unexplained Dizziness in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Preliminary Retrospective Observation Study.Indian J Palliat Care. 2018 Jan-Mar;24(1):39-43. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_165_17. Indian J Palliat Care. 2018. PMID: 29440805 Free PMC article.
-
Myofacial Trigger Points in Advanced Cancer Patients.Indian J Palliat Care. 2016 Jan-Mar;22(1):80-4. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.173956. Indian J Palliat Care. 2016. PMID: 26962285 Free PMC article.
-
Soins palliatifs en temps de pandémie: au-delà des respirateurs et des vies à sauver.CMAJ. 2020 Oct 19;192(42):E1288-E1293. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200465-f. CMAJ. 2020. PMID: 33077529 Free PMC article. French. No abstract available.
-
Emphasizing High Value, Cost-Effective Care in Physical Examination Instruction - A Qualitative Content Analysis of Interviews with Expert Educators.MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Mar 21;7:64. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000064.1. eCollection 2018. MedEdPublish (2016). 2018. PMID: 38089205 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Verghese A, Horwitz RI. In praise of the physical examination. BMJ. 2009;339:b5448. - PubMed
-
- Oboler SK, Prochazka AV, Gonzales R, Xu S, Anderson RJ. Public expectations and attitudes for annual physical examinations and testing. Annals of internal medicine. 2002;136(9):652–9. - PubMed
-
- Kravitz RL, Cope DW, Bhrany V, Leake B. Internal medicine patients’ expectations for care during office visits. Journal of general internal medicine. 1994;9(2):75–81. - PubMed
-
- Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Blum MJ. The relationship between patients’ satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Medical care. 1989;27(11):1027–35. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical