Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2014 Jan;8(1):107-11.
doi: 10.12816/0006076.

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt with communicating peritoneal & subcutaneous pseudocysts formation

Case Reports

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt with communicating peritoneal & subcutaneous pseudocysts formation

Al-Duraibi Sharifa. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2014 Jan.

Abstract

A case of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pseudocysts in a patient with a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt is reported to describeacute unusual location of developmentof pseudocyst. In the setting of a VP shunt, the frequency of abdominal CSF pseudocyst formation is approximately 4.5%, often being precipitated by a recent inflammatory/infective process or recent surgery. Larger pseudocysts tend to be sterile, whereas smaller or multiloculated pseudocysts are more often infected. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) has characteristic findings. This is an uncommon presentation of VP shunt with no evidence of infection. The objective of this case report is to create awareness about imaging findings of complications of VP shunt at an unusual location.

Keywords: Cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst; Computed tomography; Ultrasound; Ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1-a
Fig. 1-a
Contrast enhanced abdominopelvic CT scan axial images shows 5× 4 x 5 cm well defined non-enhancing cystic area in the right paraumbilical regionalong with internal shunt catheters (arrows).
Fig 1b
Fig 1b
Contrast enhanced abdominopelvic CT scan sagittal reformate image showperitoneal and abdominal wall pseudocysts.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Contrast enhanced abdominopelvic CT scan axial images shows two shunt catheter tubes (arrows).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT scan coronal reformate image shows the course of the catheter surrounded by the pseudocysts formation.

References

    1. Esposito C, Porreca A, Gangemi M, et al. The use of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal complications of ventriculoperitoneal shunts in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;13:352–354. - PubMed
    1. Bal RK, Singh P, Harjai MM. Intestinal volvulus – a rare complication of ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;15(8):577–578. - PubMed
    1. Paddon AJ, Horton D. Knotting of distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt tubing. Clin radiol. 2000;55:1–3. - PubMed
    1. Acharya R, Ramachandran CS, Singh S. Laparoscopic management of abdominal complications in ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2001;11:167–170. - PubMed
    1. Wani AA, Ramzan A, Wani MA. Protrusion of a peritoneal catheter through the umbilicus: an unusual complication of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002;18:171–172. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources