Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 16;1(3):130-4.
doi: 10.1021/ml1000307. eCollection 2010 Jun 10.

Discovery of NVP-LDE225, a Potent and Selective Smoothened Antagonist

Affiliations

Discovery of NVP-LDE225, a Potent and Selective Smoothened Antagonist

Shifeng Pan et al. ACS Med Chem Lett. .

Abstract

The blockade of aberrant hedgehog (Hh) signaling has shown promise for therapeutic intervention in cancer. A cell-based phenotypic high-throughput screen was performed, and the lead structure (1) was identified as an inhibitor of the Hh pathway via antagonism of the Smoothened receptor (Smo). Structure-activity relationship studies led to the discovery of a potent and specific Smoothened antagonist N-(6-((2S,6R)-2,6-dimethylmorpholino)pyridin-3-yl)-2-methyl-4'-(trifluoromethoxy)biphenyl-3-carboxamide (5m, NVP-LDE225), which is currently in clinical development.

Keywords: Hedgehog signaling pathway; Smoothened; medulloblastoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structures of cyclopamine, GDC-0449, and IPI-926.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure of 1, a screening hit.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. General Synthetic Scheme
Reagents and conditions: (a) Anilines or aminopyridines, HATU, Et3N, DMF. (b) Boronic acids, cat. Pd(PPh3)4, Na2CO3, DME−H2O.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Antitumor activity upon treatment with 5m diphosphate salt or vehicle in a Ptch+/−p53−/− medulloblastoma subcutaneous allograft model in nude mice. Treatment started on day 8 postimplantation (5 million cells/animal). Compound 5m was administered po at 5 (filled triangle), 10 (open triangle), and 20 (filled diamond) mg/kg/day qd for 13 days total. All doses are expressed as free base equivalents. Vehicle control (open square) of 5m: 0.5% methylcellulose and 0.5% Tween 80 in water. All treatment groups consisted of eight animals. The vehicle group was taken down 7−9 days after treatment due to excessive tumor size (greater than 10% of mouse body weight). The body weight change observed was <±5% for all treated groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Gli1 mRNA inhibition (open circle), tumor PK (filled squares), and plasma PK (filled triangles) in Ptch+/−p53−/− medulloblastoma model after treatment with 5m. Plasma and tumors were harvested at 4, 8, 16, and 24 h after a single oral dose of 5m at 5, 10, or 20 mg/kg. Gli1 mRNA levels were analyzed by real-time PCR and normalized to β-actin expression. Data shown are percent inhibition relative to vehicle-treated control tumors. Compound 5m concentrations were determined in plasma and tumor by LC-MS/MS. N = 3 per time point.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Antitumor activity in an orthotopic Ptch+/−p53−/− medulloblastoma allograft model in nude mice upon treatment with 5m diphosphate salt dosed at 40 mg/kg/day po bid or vehicle at equal dose volume. Athymic nude mice were implanted with 100000 tumor cells 17 days before the start of dosing. Daily treatment (vehicle or 5m) was initiated on day 0. Eight animals were enrolled into each group. MRI scans were performed at baseline and day 4 postinitiation of treatment. The bar graph represents the group mean ± SEM, with crosses indicating data from individual animals. At each time point, a representative 3D rendering and paired MRI are shown of an animal representative of the group mean. To enable longitudinal comparisons, the selected MRI is from the same animal over time point.

References

    1. Stone D. M.; Hynes M.; Armanini M.; Swanson T. A.; Gu Q.; Johnson R. L.; Scott M. P.; Pennica D.; Goddard A.; Phillips H.; Noll M.; Hooper J. E.; de Sauvage F.; Rosenthal A. The tumour-suppressor gene patched encodes a candidate receptor for Sonic hedgehog. Nature 1996, 384, 129–134. - PubMed
    1. McMahon A. P.; Ingham P. W.; Tabin C. J. Developmental roles and clinical significance of hedgehog signaling. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2003, 53, 1–114. - PubMed
    1. Ingham P. W.; McMahon A. P. Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 3059–3087. - PubMed
    1. di Magliano M. P.; Hebrok M. Hedgehog signaling in cancer formation and maintenance. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 903–911. - PubMed
    1. Rubin L. L.; de Sauvage F. J. Targeting the hedgehog pathway in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2006, 5, 1026–1033. - PubMed