Inter-observer reproducibility before and after web-based education in the Gleason grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma among the Iranian pathologists
- PMID: 24902017
Inter-observer reproducibility before and after web-based education in the Gleason grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma among the Iranian pathologists
Abstract
This study was aimed at determining intra and inter-observer concordance rates in the Gleason scoring of prostatic adenocarcinoma, before and after a web-based educational course. In this self-controlled study, 150 tissue samples of prostatic adenocarcinoma are re-examined to be scored according to the Gleason scoring system. Then all pathologists attend a free web-based course. Afterwards, the same 150 samples [with different codes compared to the previous ones] are distributed differently among the pathologists to be assigned Gleason scores. After gathering the data, the concordance rate in the first and second reports of pathologists is determined. In the pre web-education, the mean kappa value of Interobserver agreement was 0.25 [fair agreement]. Post web-education significantly improved with the mean kappa value of 0.52 [moderate agreement]. Using weighted kappa values, significant improvement was observed in inter-observer agreement in higher scores of Gleason grade; Score 10 was achieved for the mean kappa value in post web-education was 0.68 [substantial agreement] compared to 0.25 (fair agreement) in pre web-education. Web-based training courses are attractive to pathologists as they do not need to spend much time and money. Therefore, such training courses are strongly recommended for significant pathological issues including the grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma. Through web-based education, pathologists can exchange views and contribute to the rise in the level of reproducibility. Such programs need to be included in post-graduation programs.
Similar articles
-
Inter/intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason scoring in prostate adenocarcinoma in Iranian pathologists.Urol J. 2012 Spring;9(2):486-90. Urol J. 2012. PMID: 22641492
-
Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.Indian J Cancer. 2011 Oct-Dec;48(4):488-95. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.92277. Indian J Cancer. 2011. PMID: 22293266
-
A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Aug;129(8):1004-10. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-1004-ACOIRO. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005. PMID: 16048389
-
Discordance Among Pathologists in the United States and Europe in Diagnosis of Low-Grade Dysplasia for Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):564-570.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.041. Epub 2016 Nov 3. Gastroenterology. 2017. PMID: 27818167
-
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016. PMID: 26492179 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.Comput Educ. 2020 Feb;145:103726. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726. Comput Educ. 2020. PMID: 32565611 Free PMC article.
-
Significant Inter- and Intralaboratory Variation in Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Study of 35,258 Patients in The Netherlands.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 27;13(21):5378. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215378. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34771542 Free PMC article.