Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 5:14:64.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-64.

Patient-centred care in general dental practice--a systematic review of the literature

Affiliations

Patient-centred care in general dental practice--a systematic review of the literature

Ian Mills et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Delivering improvements in quality is a key objective within most healthcare systems, and a view which has been widely embraced within the NHS in the United Kingdom. Within the NHS, quality is evaluated across three key dimensions: clinical effectiveness, safety and patient experience, with the latter modelled on the Picker Principles of Patient-Centred Care (PCC). Quality improvement is an important feature of the current dental contract reforms in England, with "patient experience" likely to have a central role in the evaluation of quality. An understanding and appreciation of the evidence underpinning PCC within dentistry is highly relevant if we are to use this as a measure of quality in general dental practice.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify the features of PCC relevant to dentistry and ascertain the current research evidence base underpinning its use as a measure of quality within general dental practice.

Results: Three papers were identified which met the inclusion criteria and demonstrated the use of primary research to provide an understanding of the key features of PCC within dentistry. None of the papers identified were based in general dental practice and none of the three studies sought the views of patients. Some distinct differences were noted between the key features of PCC reported within the dental literature and those developed within the NHS Patient Experience Framework.

Conclusions: This systematic review reveals a lack of understanding of PCC within dentistry, and in particular general dental practice. There is currently a poor evidence base to support the use of the current patient reported outcome measures as indicators of patient-centredness. Further research is necessary to understand the important features of PCC in dentistry and patients' views should be central to this research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm. Book Crossing the Quality Chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. City: Institute of Medicine; 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. - PubMed
    1. Australian Commission on Safety and Qaulity in Healthcare. Book Patient-Centred Care: Improving Quality and Safety by Focusing Care on Patients and Consumers. City: ACSQHC; 2010. Patient-Centred Care: Improving Quality and Safety by Focusing Care on Patients and Consumers.
    1. Goodrich J, Cornwell J. Seeing the Person in the Patient. The Point of Care Review Paper. London: King’s Fund; 2008.
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Book National Healthcare Quality Report. City: AHRQ; 2003. National Healthcare Quality Report.
    1. Eight picker principles of patient-centered care. http://pickerinstitute.org/about/picker-principles/

Publication types