Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 6:4:5039.
doi: 10.1038/srep05039.

Surface recombination and charged exciton in nanocrystal quantum dots on photonic crystals under two-photon excitation

Affiliations

Surface recombination and charged exciton in nanocrystal quantum dots on photonic crystals under two-photon excitation

Xingsheng Xu. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In this study, the two-photon excited fluorescence spectra from cadmium selenide quantum dots (QDs) on a silicon nitride photonic crystal (PhC) membrane under femtosecond laser irradiation were investigated. These spectra can be fit to a tri-Gaussian function in which one component is negative in amplitude, and in which the Gaussian components with positive amplitude are assigned to exciton emission and charged-exciton emission and that with negative amplitude is assigned to absorption from surface recombination. The photonic crystal enhance the charged-exciton emission and exciton emission and, at the same time, also the absorption from surface recombination. Both the charged-exciton emission and the surface recombination are related to Auger recombination; therefore, the photonic crystal controls both radiative recombination and non-radiative recombination. The asymmetries of the two-photon excited fluorescence spectra are due to not only the location of the resonant guide mode of the PhC slab but also the enhancement of the absorption from surface recombination by PhC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Recorded and fitted two-photon excited fluorescence (TPF) spectra of QDs on a PhC with a lattice constant 560 nm.
(a), TPF spectrum fitted to a tri-Gaussian function with one negative amplitude under an excitation power of 4.64 mW. (b), The three fitted Gaussian components are shown separately; curves A1 and A2 correspond to the components with a positive amplitude, and curve A3 corresponds to the component with a negative amplitude. The curves are shown together with their superposition (curve D) and the measured spectrum. (c), QD TPF spectrum fit to a tri-Gaussian function with one negative amplitude under an excitation power of 9.3 mW. (d), The three fitted Gaussian components in c are shown separately; curves A1 and A2 correspond to the components with a positive amplitude, and curve A3 corresponds to the component with a negative amplitude. The spectra are shown together with their superposition (curve D) and the measured spectrum.
Figure 2
Figure 2. TPF spectrum and Gaussian fitting for QDs on a PhC with a lattice constant of 580 nm.
(a), TPF spectrum fitted to a tri-Gaussian function with one negative amplitude under an excitation power of 4.64 mW. (b), The three fitted Gaussian components are shown separately; curves A1 and A2 correspond to the components with a positive amplitude, and curve A3 corresponds to the component with a negative amplitude. The spectra are shown together with their superposition (curve D) and the measured spectrum. (c), TPF spectrum fitted to a tri-Gaussian function with one negative amplitude under an excitation power of 9.3 mW. (d), The three fitted Gaussian components in (c) are shown separately; curves A1 and A2 correspond to the components with a positive amplitude, and curve A3 corresponds to the component with a negative amplitude. The spectra are shown together with their superposition (curve D) and the measured spectrum. (e), Comparison of the fitted spectra to the tri-Gaussian under the excitation powers of 4.64 mW and 9.3 mW. (f–h), Fitting parameters for the tri-Gaussian function for different excitation intensities (subscripts ‘1', ‘2' and ‘3' indicate the long-, middle- and short-wavelength components, respectively): (f), centre wavelengths ω1, ω2 and ω3; (g), spectral widths δω1, δω2 and δω3; (h), ratios of components, A1/(A1 + A2 + A3), A2/(A1 + A2 + A3) and A3/(A1 + A2 + A3).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fitting parameters for the tri-Gaussian function as a function of the PhC lattice constant.
(a), Centre wavelengths. (b), Ratios of the components.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the band structure of the QDs illustrating carrier trapping and optical transitions.
(a), exciton emission X0; (b), charged exciton (positive trion) emission X+; (c), negative trion emission X; (d), Auger recombination; (e), photo-induced loss of the emission light due to surface recombination, in which the hole is driven to the surface state, and surface recombination takes place. The horizontal lines besides band gap represent the surface states, the horizontal dotted line represents the potential of QD boundary.

References

    1. Cho K. S. et al. High-performance crosslinked colloidal quantum-dot light-emitting diodes. Nat. Photon. 3, 341–345 (2009).
    1. Konstantatos G. et al. Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors. Nature 442, 180–183 (2006). - PubMed
    1. Wang X. H. et al. Tandem colloidal quantum dot solar cells employing a graded recombination layer. Nat. Photon. 5, 480–484 (2011).
    1. Medintz I. et al. Self-assembled nanoscale biosensors based on quantum dot FRET donors. Nat. Mater. 2, 630–638 (2003). - PubMed
    1. Riley E. A., Hess C. M. & Reid P. J. Photoluminescence Intermittency from Single Quantum Dots to Organic Molecules: Emerging Themes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13(10), 12487–12518 (2012). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources