Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 May 20:5:459.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00459. eCollection 2014.

Learning mathematics in two dimensions: a review and look ahead at teaching and learning early childhood mathematics with children's literature

Affiliations
Review

Learning mathematics in two dimensions: a review and look ahead at teaching and learning early childhood mathematics with children's literature

Lucia M Flevares et al. Front Psychol. .

Erratum in

  • Front Psychol. 2014;5:854

Abstract

In the past 25 years an identifiable interest in using children's literature in mathematics learning emerged (Clyne and Griffiths, 1991; Welchman-Tischler, 1992; Hong, 1996; Hellwig etal., 2000; Haury, 2001). We critically review the rationales given for the use of picture books in mathematics learning, with a special focus on geometry due to its underrepresentation in this body of literature and the need for greater focus on this topic. The benefits and effectiveness of using picture books for children's mathematics learning and interest have been documented (Hong, 1996; O'Neill etal., 2004; Young-Loveridge, 2004). For geometry, although much learning of shape ideas should be hands-on, two-dimensional figures are essential to develop children's understanding of plane geometry. Books may effectively engage pre-literate children with plane shapes (van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and van den Boogaard, 2008; Skoumpourdi and Mpakopoulou, 2011) and shapes as gestalt wholes or prototypes (van Hiele, 1986; Clements etal., 1999; Hannibal, 1999). We review several guidelines and evaluative criteria for book selection, including Cianciolo (2000), Schiro (1997), Hunsader (2004), and van den Heuvel-Panhuizen and Elia (2012). Geometry concepts have proven challenging for young students, but their difficulties may stem, in part, from inadequate teacher training and professional development (Clements and Sarama, 2000; Chard etal., 2008) which lead to misconceptions (Oberdorf and Taylor-Cox, 1999; Inan and Dogan-Temur, 2010). Using picture books in teacher training may be an inviting way for early childhood teachers to enhance their own knowledge. We will examine the literature for guidance on incorporating children's literature into teacher training. In closing we will outline a comprehensive, multi-pronged agenda for best instructional practices for selection and use of children's books in mathematics activities and for teacher training.

Keywords: children’s literature; early childhood; geometry; mathematics; picture books; professional development.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson A., Anderson J., Shapiro J. (2004). Mathematical discourse in shared storybook reading. J. Res. Math. Educ. 35 5–33 10.2307/30034801 - DOI
    1. Anderson A., Anderson J., Shapiro J. (2005). Supporting multiple literacies: Parents’ and children’s mathematical talk within storybook reading. Math. Educ. Res. J. 16 5–26 10.1007/BF03217399 - DOI
    1. Arizpe E., Styles M. (2003). Children Reading Pictures. Interpreting Visual Texts. London: Routledge/Falmer
    1. Ball D. L., Thames M. H., Phelps G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching. J. Teach. Educ. 5 389–407 10.1177/0022487108324554 - DOI
    1. Beard V. (1962). Mathematics in kindergarten. Arithmet. Teach. 9 22–25

LinkOut - more resources