Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;35(5):323-33.
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000063.

Executive function mediates effects of gestational age on functional outcomes and behavior in preschoolers

Affiliations

Executive function mediates effects of gestational age on functional outcomes and behavior in preschoolers

Irene M Loe et al. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the role of executive function (EF) skills, measured by parent-rating and performance-based instruments, as mediators of the effects of gestational age (GA) on functional outcomes and behavior symptoms in preterm (PT) and full-term (FT) preschoolers.

Patients and methods: Children born PT (n = 70; mean GA, 29.6 weeks; mean birth weight, 1365 g) were compared to children born FT (n = 79) on composite measures of EF (using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function and a performance-based EF battery), adaptive function, prereading skills, and behavior symptoms. For the entire sample, mediation analyses examined the effect of GA on the outcomes with EF as mediator.

Results: Compared to children born FT, children born PT had significantly higher parent-rated EF scores and lower performance-based EF scores, both indicating more problems; furthermore, children born PT had lower adaptive function and prereading scores and more problematic behavior. GA contributed to adaptive function, prereading skills, and behavior symptoms for all children. EF acted as a mediator of GA for all 3 outcomes; different patterns emerged for parent-rated and performance-based EF evaluations. For adaptive function, both EF measures significantly mediated the effects of GA; for prereading skills, only performance-based EF was significant; for behavior symptoms, only parent-rated EF was significant.

Conclusions: We propose standard assessment of EF, using both parent-rating and performance-based EF measures, in young PT children and other children at the risk of EF impairments. EF skills are measurable, mediate important functional outcomes, and may serve as intervention targets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
1a. Total Effects Model—shows the relationship (c) between predictor X and outcome Y. 1b. A simple mediation model in path diagram form includes the mediator and its relationship to predictor X (a) and outcome Y (b), or indirect effect. The direct effect between X and Y (accounting for the mediator in the model) is illustrated by c’.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Total Effects Model is in the lower part of the figure; the multiple mediation model in path diagram form with both parent-rated EF and performance-based EF in the model is directly above. T-statistics and significance level are presented for each path (inner values correspond to performance-based EF and outer values to parent-rated EF). Indirect effects of gestational age on the Adaptive Behavior Composite through both parent-rated and performance-based EF were significant.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The Total Effects Model is in the lower part of the figure; the multiple mediation model in path diagram form with both parent-rated EF and performance-based EF in the model is directly above. T-statistics and significance level are presented for each path (inner values correspond to performance-based EF and outer values to parent-rated EF). Indirect effect of gestational age on the Phonologic Awareness Score through performance-based EF was significant.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The Total Effects Model is in the lower part of the figure; the multiple mediation model in path diagram form with both parent-rated EF and performance-based EF in the model is directly above. T-statistics and significance level are presented for each path (inner values correspond to performance-based EF and outer values to parent-rated EF). Indirect effect of gestational age on the Total Behavior Problems score through parent-rated EF was significant. **p significant at <.05 Abbreviations: GA, gestational age; EF, executive function

References

    1. Anderson P. Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychol. 2002;8:71–82. - PubMed
    1. Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, et al. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognit Psychol. 2000;41:49–100. - PubMed
    1. Blair C, Razza RP. Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Dev. 2007;78:647–663. - PubMed
    1. Cameron CE, Brock LL, Murrah WM, et al. Fine motor skills and executive function both contribute to kindergarten achievement. Child Dev. 2012;83:1229–1244. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diamantopoulou S, Rydell AM, Thorell LB, et al. Impact of executive functioning and symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder on children’s peer relations and school performance. Dev Neuropsychol. 2007;32:521–542. - PubMed

Publication types