Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jun 6;55(7):4206-12.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13683.

Estimating minimally important differences for two vision-specific quality of life measures

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Estimating minimally important differences for two vision-specific quality of life measures

Brenda W Gillespie et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. .

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate minimally important differences (MIDs) for the Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ) and the National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ).

Methods: A total of 607 subjects with newly-diagnosed open-angle glaucoma (OAG) was enrolled in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) and randomized to initial treatment with medications or surgery. Subjects underwent an ophthalmic examination and telephone-administered quality of life (QOL) interview before randomization and every six months thereafter. The VAQ and NEI-VFQ were used to assess participants' perceptions of their visual function. Clinical measures included the mean deviation (MD) from Humphrey 24-2 full threshold visual field (VF) testing, and best-corrected visual acuity (VA) measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol. Anchor-based (using MD and VA) and distribution-based methods were used to estimate MIDs.

Results: Anchor-based cross-sectional analyses at 66 months follow-up found a 10-letter increment in better eye VA corresponded to MIDs of 5.2 units for VAQ and 3.8 units for NEI-VFQ total scores. A 3-dB increment in the better eye MD yielded MIDs of 2.6 and 2.3 units for the same two questionnaires. In longitudinal analyses, MIDs for the VAQ were 3.2 units for a 10-letter change of VA and 3.4 units for a 3-dB change in the MD. Distribution-based MIDs were larger.

Conclusions: A range of MIDs for the VAQ (2.6-6.5 units) and NEI-VFQ (2.3-3.8 units) was found. Although similar in magnitude, MIDs were sensitive to the MID estimation method, the anchor chosen, and differences between questionnaires. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000149.).

Keywords: CIGTS; MID; NEI-VFQ; VAQ; glaucoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplots showing change in VAQ subscales from baseline to last follow-up stratified by categories of MD change. Medians in the last panel of boxplots (for the VAQ peripheral vision) are zero for all categories of MD change. VAQ, Visual Activities Questionnaire; MD, mean devaition; dB, decibels.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the MIDs between anchors (MD and VA), for each quality of life measure (VAQ and NEI-VFQ) and method (cross-sectional [X-Sec], longitudinal [Long], and distributional [Dist]). MID, minimally important difference; MD, mean deviation; VA, visual acuity; VAQ, Visual Activities Questionnaire; NEI-VFQ, National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire.

References

    1. Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 102–109 - PubMed
    1. Eton DT, Cella D, Yost KJ, et al. A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004; 57: 898–910 - PubMed
    1. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimally clinically important difference. Contr Clin Trials. 1989; 10: 407–415 - PubMed
    1. Guyatt GH, Osoba U, Wu AW, et al. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002; 77: 371–383 - PubMed
    1. McKean-Cowdin R, Varma R, Wu J, et al. Severity of visual field loss and health-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143: 1013–1023 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data