Can selective arterial clamping with fluorescence imaging preserve kidney function during robotic partial nephrectomy?
- PMID: 24909960
- PMCID: PMC4683014
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.044
Can selective arterial clamping with fluorescence imaging preserve kidney function during robotic partial nephrectomy?
Abstract
Objective: To compare renal functional outcomes in robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) with selective arterial clamping guided by near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging to a matched cohort of patients who underwent RPN without selective arterial clamping and NIRF imaging.
Methods: From April 2011 to December 2012, NIRF imaging-enhanced RPN with selective clamping was used in 42 cases. Functional outcomes of successful cases were compared with a cohort of patients, matched by tumor size, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), functional kidney status, age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score, who underwent RPN without selective clamping and NIRF imaging.
Results: In matched-pair analysis, selective clamping with NIRF was associated with superior kidney function at discharge, as demonstrated by postoperative eGFR (78.2 vs 68.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = .04), absolute reduction of eGFR (-2.5 vs -14.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P <.01), and percent change in eGFR (-1.9% vs -16.8%; P <.01). Similar trends were noted at 3 month follow-up, but these differences became nonsignificant (P[eGFR] = .07; P[absolute reduction of eGFR] = .10; and P[percent change in eGFR] = .07). In the selective clamping group, a total of 4 perioperative complications occurred in 3 patients, all of which were Clavien grade I-III.
Conclusion: Use of NIRF imaging was associated with improved short-term renal functional outcomes when compared with RPN without selective arterial clamping and NIRF imaging. With this effect attenuated at later follow-up, randomized prospective studies and long-term assessment of kidney-specific functional outcomes are needed to further assess the benefits of this technology.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Reply: To PMID 24909960.Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):334. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.061. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Urology. 2014. PMID: 24909959 No abstract available.
-
Editorial comment.Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):332-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.046. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Urology. 2014. PMID: 24909961 No abstract available.
-
Editorial comment.Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):334. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.060. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Urology. 2014. PMID: 24909962 No abstract available.
-
Reply: To PMID 24909960.Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):333. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.047. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Urology. 2014. PMID: 24909963 No abstract available.
-
Re: Can selective arterial clamping with fluorescence imaging preserve kidney function during robotic partial nephrectomy?J Urol. 2015 Feb;193(2):458-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.11.024. Epub 2014 Nov 13. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25617270 No abstract available.
-
Words of wisdom. Re: Can selective arterial clamping with fluorescence imaging preserve kidney function during robotic partial nephrectomy?Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):592. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.060. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 25760415 No abstract available.
References
-
- Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 2009;182:1271–1279. - PubMed
-
- Weight CJ, Lieser G, Larson BT, et al. Partial nephrectomy is associated with improved overall survival compared to radical nephrectomy in patients with unanticipated benign renal tumours. Eur Urol. 2010;58:293–298. - PubMed
-
- Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology. 2004;64:914–918. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous