Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2014 Jul:409:21-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

The Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology (CHAVI) multi-site quality assurance program for cryopreserved human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology (CHAVI) multi-site quality assurance program for cryopreserved human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Marcella Sarzotti-Kelsoe et al. J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

The Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology (CHAVI) consortium was established to determine the host and virus factors associated with HIV transmission, infection and containment of virus replication, with the goal of advancing the development of an HIV protective vaccine. Studies to meet this goal required the use of cryopreserved Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell (PBMC) specimens, and therefore it was imperative that a quality assurance (QA) oversight program be developed to monitor PBMC samples obtained from study participants at multiple international sites. Nine site-affiliated laboratories in Africa and the USA collected and processed PBMCs, and cryopreserved PBMC were shipped to CHAVI repositories in Africa and the USA for long-term storage. A three-stage program was designed, based on Good Clinical Laboratory Practices (GCLP), to monitor PBMC integrity at each step of this process. The first stage evaluated the integrity of fresh PBMCs for initial viability, overall yield, and processing time at the site-affiliated laboratories (Stage 1); for the second stage, the repositories determined post-thaw viability and cell recovery of cryopreserved PBMC, received from the site-affiliated laboratories (Stage 2); the third stage assessed the long-term specimen storage at each repository (Stage 3). Overall, the CHAVI PBMC QA oversight program results highlight the relative importance of each of these stages to the ultimate goal of preserving specimen integrity from peripheral blood collection to long-term repository storage.

Keywords: Biorepository; Cryopreservation; HIV; Human clinical trials; PBMC; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Design of the CHAVI PBMC QA Oversight Program
This schematic illustrates the shipment of PBMC from the site-affiliated laboratories to the repositories and to end user laboratories and the stages of the CHAVI PBMC QA Oversight Program: Stage 1 - PBMC Initial viability, yield, and processing time at the site-affiliated laboratories; Stage 2 - Cryopreserved PBMC viability and cell recovery after thawing at the repositories; Stage 3 - Sentinel Program for long-term storage of cryopreserved PBMCs at the repositories.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Stage 2 - Cryopreserved PBMC Viability and Cell Recovery after Thawing at the Repositories
The Day 1 PBMC post-thaw viability (Panel A) and total cell recovery (Panel B) QC results from PBMC preparations collected over five years from each site-affiliated laboratory are presented. The bars represent the raw data mean +/− 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for the QC results (left axis). The circle markers on the line represent the percent of the PBMC preparations from each site-affiliated laboratory that passed the acceptance criteria (right axis). The asterisks in Panel A indicate that the viability results differed between site-affiliated laboratories based on non-overlapping model-based 95% CI boundaries of the means. The upper and lower limits of the acceptance criteria are indicated by the horizontal dotted line(s) in each of the graphs. Acceptance criteria for PBMCs: post thaw viability ≥80%; post-thaw total cell recovery 55–120%.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Stage 3 - Sentinel Program for Long-Term Storage of Cryopreserved PBMCs at the Repositories
The control sample post-thaw viability (Panel A) and Day 1 total cell recovery (Panel B) QC results collected over two years from each thawing location are presented. The bars represent the raw data mean +/− 95% CI for the viability results and the model-based mean +/− 95% CI for the recovery results (left axis). The circle markers on the line represent the percent of the control sample vials from each thaw site that passed the acceptance criteria (right axis) Acceptance criteria for the control samples: post-thaw viability ≥92.9%; post-thaw recovery 57.7–120.7%.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Stage 3 - Sentinel Program for Long-Term Storage of Cryopreserved PBMCs at the Repositories: Analysis of Each Repository Freezer over Time
Post-thaw viability (Panel A) and Day 1 total cell recovery (Panel B) QC results from the control sample vials stored in each repository freezer [Freezer A and B at the central repository 1 (R1 A, R1 B); Freezer A at the central repository 2 (R2 A); and Freezer A at the repository 3 (R3 A)] over two years are presented. The markers represent the raw data mean +/− 95% CI for the QC results. The asterisk in Panel B indicates that, by regression analysis, Freezer A at repository 3 control sample post-thaw recoveries changed over time (p=1.000). The upper and lower limits of the Acceptance Criteria are indicated by the horizontal dotted line(s) in each of the graphs. Acceptance criteria for the control samples: post-thaw viability ≥92.9%; post-thaw recovery 57.7–120.7%.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afonso G, Scotto M, Renand A, Arvastsson J, Vassilieff D, Cilio CM, Mallone R. Critical parameters in blood processing for T-cell assays: validation on ELISpot and tetramer platforms. J Immunol Methods. 2010;359:28–36. - PubMed
    1. Aziz N, Margolick JB, Detels R, Rinaldo CR, Phair J, Jamieson BD, Butch AW. Value of a quality assessment program in optimizing cryopreservation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in a multicenter study. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20:590–595. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bull M, Lee D, Stucky J, Chiu YL, Rubin A, Horton H, McElrath MJ. Defining blood processing parameters for optimal detection of cryopreserved antigen-specific responses for HIV vaccine trials. J Immunol Methods. 2007;322:57–69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox JH, Ferrari G, Kalams SA, Lopaczynski W, Oden N, D’Souza MP E.C.S Group. Results of an ELISPOT proficiency panel conducted in 11 laboratories participating in international Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 vaccine trials. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 2005;21:68–81. - PubMed
    1. Disis ML, dela Rosa C, Goodell V, Kuan LY, Chang JCC, Kuus-Reichel K, Clay TM, Lyerly HK, Bhatia S, Ghanekar SA, Maino VC, Maecker HT. Maximizing the retention of antigen specific lymphocyte function after cryopreservation. J Immunol Methods. 2006;308:13–18. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms