Use of administrative and electronic health record data for development of automated algorithms for childhood diabetes case ascertainment and type classification: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study
- PMID: 24913103
- PMCID: PMC4229415
- DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12152
Use of administrative and electronic health record data for development of automated algorithms for childhood diabetes case ascertainment and type classification: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study
Abstract
Background: The performance of automated algorithms for childhood diabetes case ascertainment and type classification may differ by demographic characteristics.
Objective: This study evaluated the potential of administrative and electronic health record (EHR) data from a large academic care delivery system to conduct diabetes case ascertainment in youth according to type, age, and race/ethnicity.
Subjects: Of 57 767 children aged <20 yr as of 31 December 2011 seen at University of North Carolina Health Care System in 2011 were included.
Methods: Using an initial algorithm including billing data, patient problem lists, laboratory test results, and diabetes related medications between 1 July 2008 and 31 December 2011, presumptive cases were identified and validated by chart review. More refined algorithms were evaluated by type (type 1 vs. type 2), age (<10 vs. ≥10 yr) and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White vs. 'other'). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were calculated and compared.
Results: The best algorithm for ascertainment of overall diabetes cases was billing data. The best type 1 algorithm was the ratio of the number of type 1 billing codes to the sum of type 1 and type 2 billing codes ≥0.5. A useful algorithm to ascertain youth with type 2 diabetes with 'other' race/ethnicity was identified. Considerable age and racial/ethnic differences were present in type-non-specific and type 2 algorithms.
Conclusions: Administrative and EHR data may be used to identify cases of childhood diabetes (any type), and to identify type 1 cases. The performance of type 2 case ascertainment algorithms differed substantially by race/ethnicity.
Keywords: administrative data; case ascertainment; childhood diabetes; electronic health record; type classification.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Similar articles
-
An efficient approach for surveillance of childhood diabetes by type derived from electronic health record data: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1060-1067. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv207. Epub 2016 Apr 23. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27107449 Free PMC article.
-
Automated detection and classification of type 1 versus type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data.Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):914-21. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0964. Epub 2012 Nov 27. Diabetes Care. 2013. PMID: 23193215 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of algorithms to classify type 1 and 2 diabetes according to age at diagnosis using electronic health records.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00921-3. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020. PMID: 32093635 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Case-Identification Algorithms Based on Italian Healthcare Administrative Databases for Two Relevant Diseases of the Endocrine System: Diabetes Mellitus and Thyroid Disorders.Epidemiol Prev. 2019 Jul-Aug;43(4 Suppl 2):17-36. doi: 10.19191/EP19.4.S2.P008.089. Epidemiol Prev. 2019. PMID: 31650804
-
Emerging epidemic of type 2 diabetes in youth.Diabetes Care. 1999 Feb;22(2):345-54. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.2.345. Diabetes Care. 1999. PMID: 10333956 Review.
Cited by
-
Developing an automated algorithm for identification of children and adolescents with diabetes using electronic health records from the OneFlorida+ clinical research network.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jan;27(1):102-110. doi: 10.1111/dom.15987. Epub 2024 Sep 30. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025. PMID: 39344840
-
Evaluating the Use of Electronic Health Records for Type 2 Diabetes Surveillance in 2 California Counties, 2010-2014.Public Health Rep. 2017 Jul/Aug;132(4):463-470. doi: 10.1177/0033354917708988. Epub 2017 Jun 6. Public Health Rep. 2017. PMID: 28586621 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of ICD-10-CM codes for determination of diabetes type for persons with youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes.BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Feb 16;7(1):e000547. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000547. eCollection 2019. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019. PMID: 30899525 Free PMC article.
-
Medical Costs Associated With Diabetes Complications in Medicare Beneficiaries Aged 65 Years or Older With Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes Care. 2022 Nov 1;45(11):2570-2576. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2151. Diabetes Care. 2022. PMID: 36102675 Free PMC article.
-
Developing a Computable Phenotype for Identifying Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Diabetes Using Electronic Health Records in the DiCAYA Network.Diabetes Care. 2025 Jun 1;48(6):914-921. doi: 10.2337/dc24-1972. Diabetes Care. 2025. PMID: 40163581
References
-
- SEARCH Study Group. SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth: a multicenter study of the prevalence, incidence and classification of diabetes mellitus in youth. Control Clin Trials. 2004;25:458–471. - PubMed
-
- Dabelea D, et al. Is prevalence of type 2 diabetes increasing in youth? the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study [abstract] Diabetes. 2012;66(Suppl. 1):A61.
-
- Mayer-Davis EJ, et al. Increase in prevalence of type 1 diabetes from the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study: 2001 to 2009 [abstract] Diabetes. 2012;66(Suppl. 1):A322.
-
- Duncan GE. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose levels among US adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2002. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:523–528. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- U01 DP000247/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- U01 DP000245/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- M01 RR000069/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000154/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U18 DP002714/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- U01 DP000244/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- P30 DK57516/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR00423/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U18DP002710-01/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- U18 DP002709/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001082/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000423/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DP000250/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- P30 DK017047/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 TR001111/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- P30 DK057516/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- HIR 10-001/HX/HSRD VA/United States
- 1U18DP002709/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- UL1TR000083/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- DP-05069/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- U18 DP002710/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- U18DP002714/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- U01 DP000248/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- UL1 TR002489/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 RR025014/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- UL1 RR029882/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- DP-10001/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- UL1 TR000077/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- U01 DP000246/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- U01 DP000254/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- UL1 RR026314/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
- U18 DP002708/DP/NCCDPHP CDC HHS/United States
- UL1RR029882/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical