How is the electronic health record being used? Use of EHR data to assess physician-level variability in technology use
- PMID: 24914013
- PMCID: PMC4215048
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002627
How is the electronic health record being used? Use of EHR data to assess physician-level variability in technology use
Abstract
Background: Studies of the effects of electronic health records (EHRs) have had mixed findings, which may be attributable to unmeasured confounders such as individual variability in use of EHR features.
Objective: To capture physician-level variations in use of EHR features, associations with other predictors, and usage intensity over time.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study of primary care providers eligible for meaningful use at a network of federally qualified health centers, using commercial EHR data from January 2010 through June 2013, a period during which the organization was preparing for and in the early stages of meaningful use.
Results: Data were analyzed for 112 physicians and nurse practitioners, consisting of 430,803 encounters with 99,649 patients. EHR usage metrics were developed to capture how providers accessed and added to patient data (eg, problem list updates), used clinical decision support (eg, responses to alerts), communicated (eg, printing after-visit summaries), and used panel management options (eg, viewed panel reports). Provider-level variability was high: for example, the annual average proportion of encounters with problem lists updated ranged from 5% to 60% per provider. Some metrics were associated with provider, patient, or encounter characteristics. For example, problem list updates were more likely for new patients than established ones, and alert acceptance was negatively correlated with alert frequency.
Conclusions: Providers using the same EHR developed personalized patterns of use of EHR features. We conclude that physician-level usage of EHR features may be a valuable additional predictor in research on the effects of EHRs on healthcare quality and costs.
Keywords: electronic health records; informatics; meaningful use; primary care; technology adoption.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Similar articles
-
Associations between healthcare quality and use of electronic health record functions in ambulatory care.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):864-71. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv030. Epub 2015 Apr 20. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015. PMID: 25896648 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 10;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0430-8. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017. PMID: 28395667 Free PMC article.
-
How are Electronic Health Records Associated with Provider Productivity and Billing in Orthopaedic Surgery?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2443-2451. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000896. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 31389875 Free PMC article.
-
Opportunities to use electronic health record audit logs to improve cancer care.Cancer Med. 2022 Sep;11(17):3296-3303. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4690. Epub 2022 Mar 29. Cancer Med. 2022. PMID: 35348298 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Electronic Health Record as a Quality Improvement Tool: Exceptional Potential with Special Considerations.Clin Perinatol. 2023 Jun;50(2):473-488. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Mar 21. Clin Perinatol. 2023. PMID: 37201992 Review.
Cited by
-
Graphical Presentations of Clinical Data in a Learning Electronic Medical Record.Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Aug;11(4):680-691. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709707. Epub 2020 Oct 14. Appl Clin Inform. 2020. PMID: 33058103 Free PMC article.
-
Whose System is it Anyway? How Clients and Providers Evaluate the Impact of Session EHR Use on Communication in Mental Health Treatment.Community Ment Health J. 2020 Apr;56(3):540-548. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00511-8. Epub 2019 Dec 4. Community Ment Health J. 2020. PMID: 31802323
-
Impact of a medical scribe on clinical efficiency and quality in an academic general internal medicine practice.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 11;21(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06710-y. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34247600 Free PMC article.
-
Physician Perceptions of the Electronic Problem List in Pediatric Trauma Care.Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):113-122. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677737. Epub 2019 Feb 13. Appl Clin Inform. 2019. PMID: 30759492 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Informatics Researcher's Desiderata for the Data Content of the Next Generation Electronic Health Record.Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Oct;8(4):1159-1172. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017-06-R-0101. Epub 2017 Dec 21. Appl Clin Inform. 2017. PMID: 29270955 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501–4 - PubMed
-
- Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1409–16 - PubMed
-
- Chaudhry B, Jerome W, Shinyi W, et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742–52 - PubMed
-
- Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005;116:1506–12 - PubMed
-
- Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005;293:1197–203 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources