Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 May 21;20(19):5679-84.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i19.5679.

Pathohistological classification systems in gastric cancer: diagnostic relevance and prognostic value

Affiliations
Review

Pathohistological classification systems in gastric cancer: diagnostic relevance and prognostic value

Felix Berlth et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Several pathohistological classification systems exist for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Many studies have investigated the correlation between the pathohistological characteristics in gastric cancer and patient characteristics, disease specific criteria and overall outcome. It is still controversial as to which classification system imparts the most reliable information, and therefore, the choice of system may vary in clinical routine. In addition to the most common classification systems, such as the Laurén and the World Health Organization (WHO) classifications, other authors have tried to characterize and classify gastric cancer based on the microscopic morphology and in reference to the clinical outcome of the patients. In more than 50 years of systematic classification of the pathohistological characteristics of gastric cancer, there is no sole classification system that is consistently used worldwide in diagnostics and research. However, several national guidelines for the treatment of gastric cancer refer to the Laurén or the WHO classifications regarding therapeutic decision-making, which underlines the importance of a reliable classification system for gastric cancer. The latest results from gastric cancer studies indicate that it might be useful to integrate DNA- and RNA-based features of gastric cancer into the classification systems to establish prognostic relevance. This article reviews the diagnostic relevance and the prognostic value of different pathohistological classification systems in gastric cancer.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; Laurén; Pathohistology; World Health Organization classification; classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Parkin DM. International variation. Oncogene. 2004;23:6329–6340. - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. - PubMed
    1. Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: Diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. an attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1965;64:31–49. - PubMed
    1. Leocata P, Ventura L, Giunta M, Guadagni S, Fortunato C, Discepoli S, Ventura T. [Gastric carcinoma: a histopathological study of 705 cases] Ann Ital Chir. 1998;69:331–337. - PubMed
    1. López-Carrillo L, Vega-Ramos B, Costa-Dias R, Rascón-Pacheco RA. Histological types of gastric cancer in Mexico. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26:1166–1171. - PubMed