Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 7;20(21):6608-14.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6608.

Value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT in surveillance of postoperative colorectal cancer patients with various carcinoembryonic antigen concentrations

Yan Zhang  1 , Bin Feng  1 , Guo-Li Zhang  1 , Man Hu  1 , Zheng Fu  1 , Fen Zhao  1 , Xiao-Li Zhang  1 , Li Kong  1 , Jin-Ming Yu  1
Affiliations

Value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT in surveillance of postoperative colorectal cancer patients with various carcinoembryonic antigen concentrations

Yan Zhang et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the value of positron emission tomography (PET)/computerized tomography (CT) in surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with different carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentrations.

Methods: One hundred and six postoperative CRC patients who had suspected recurrence or metastasis and received fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT within one week were included in this study. The final diagnosis was confirmed by histological examination or clinical follow-up over at least six months.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET/CT were 95.2%, 82.6%, and 92.5%, and 94.8%, 81.4% and 92.8%, respectively, in the case- and lesion-based analyses. The sensitivity and accuracy of FDG PET/CT significantly differed from CT in both analyses (χ(2) = 8.186, P = 0.004; χ(2) =6.201, P = 0.013; χ(2) =13.445, P = 0.000; χ(2) =11.194, P = 0.001). In the lesion-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET/CT in the abnormal CEA group were 97.8%, 82.6%, and 95.6%, compared with 81.3%, 80%, and 80.6% for patients with normal CEA levels. In case-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET/CT were 97.2%, 77.8%, and 95% in abnormal CEA group. Only in lesion-based analysis, the sensitivity and accuracy of FDG PET/CT in the abnormal CEA group were significantly superior to those in the normal CEA group (χ(2) =6.432, P = 0.011; χ(2) =7.837, P = 0.005). FDG PET/CT changed the management in 45.8% of patients with positive scans.

Conclusion: FDG PET/CT showed superior diagnostic value and is an advisable option in surveillance of postoperative CRC patients with a vague diagnosis.

Keywords: Carcinoembryonic antigen; Colorectal cancer; Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography; Metastasis; Recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography and computerized tomography images of a 60-year-old man with rising carcinoembryonic antigen level of 32.3 ng/mL who had undergone rectal cancer resection and chemoradiotherapy 3 years ago. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) image showed a FDG-avid metastasis lesion, which is not typical in computerized tomography (CT) image. A: CT; B: 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 38-year-old woman revealed normal carcinoembryonic antigen level of 2.8 ng/mL who underwent rectal cancer resection 22 mo ago. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) image displayed a lymph node but computerized tomography (CT) did not show it clearly. A: CT; B: 18F -FDG PET/CT.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. - PubMed
    1. Ozkan E, Soydal C, Araz M, Kir KM, Ibis E. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence in patients with elevated CEA levels. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:395–402. - PubMed
    1. Borasio P, Gisabella M, Billé A, Righi L, Longo M, Tampellini M, Ardissone F. Role of surgical resection in colorectal lung metastases: analysis of 137 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:183–190. - PubMed
    1. Hirai I, Kimura W, Fuse A, Isobe H, Hachiya O, Moriya T, Suto K, Mizutani M. Surgical management for metastatic liver tumors. Hepatogastroenterology. 2006;53:757–763. - PubMed
    1. Schaefer O, Langer M. Detection of recurrent rectal cancer with CT, MRI and PET/CT. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2044–2054. - PubMed