Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015;55(7):988-1004.
doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.679980.

Portion size: what we know and what we need to know

Affiliations
Review

Portion size: what we know and what we need to know

David Benton. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015.

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that the portion sizes of many foods have increased and in a laboratory at least this increases the amount eaten. The conclusions are, however, limited by the complexity of the phenomenon. There is a need to consider meals freely chosen over a prolonged period when a range of foods of different energy densities are available. A range of factors will influence the size of the portion size chosen: amongst others packaging, labeling, advertising, and the unit size rather than portion size of the food item. The way portion size interacts with the multitude of factors that determine food intake needs to be established. In particular, the role of portion size on energy intake should be examined as many confounding variables exist and we must be clear that it is portion size that is the major problem. If the approach is to make a practical contribution, then methods of changing portion sizes will need to be developed. This may prove to be a problem in a free market, as it is to be expected that customers will resist the introduction of smaller portion sizes, given that value for money is an important motivator.

Keywords: Bite size; energy compensation; labeling; obesity; packaging; portion size.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson G.H. Sugars, sweetness, and food intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995;62:S195–S202. - PubMed
    1. Andrews J.C., Netemeyer R.G. Burton S. Consumer generalization of nutrient content claims in advertising. J. Marketing. 1998;62:62–75.
    1. Birch L.L. Effects of peer models’ food choices and eating behaviors on preschoolers’ food preferences. Child Dev. 1980;51:489–496.
    1. Birch L.L. Deysher M. Conditioned and unconditioned caloric compensation—evidence for self-regulation of food-intake in young children. Learn. Motiv. 1985;16:341–355. - PubMed
    1. Birch L.L. Deysher M. Caloric compensation and sensory specific satiety: Evidence for self-regulation of food intake by young children. Appetite. 1986;7:323–331. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources