Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep-Oct;85(5):1915-31.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12259. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

An integrative view of school functioning: transactions between self-regulation, school engagement, and teacher-child relationship quality

Affiliations

An integrative view of school functioning: transactions between self-regulation, school engagement, and teacher-child relationship quality

Ximena A Portilla et al. Child Dev. 2014 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamic interplay between teacher-child relationship quality and children's behaviors across kindergarten and first grade to predict academic competence in first grade. Using a sample of 338 ethnically diverse 5-year-old children, nested path analytic models were conducted to examine bidirectional pathways between children's behaviors and teacher-child relationship quality. Low self-regulation in kindergarten fall, as indexed by inattention and impulsive behaviors, predicted more conflict with teachers in kindergarten spring and this effect persisted into first grade. Conflict and low self-regulation jointly predicted decreases in school engagement which in turn predicted first-grade academic competence. Findings illustrate the importance of considering transactions between self-regulation, teacher-child relationship quality, and school engagement in predicting academic competence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A summary of the freely estimated paths in hierarchically nested path analytic models. Notes. Numbers denote time point of data collection (1 = kindergarten fall, 2 = kindergarten spring, 3 = first grade spring). Model 1 represents a baseline comparison model of longitudinal stability with gender predicting this stability, after accounting for within-time point, cross-domain covariation. Model 2 represents diagonal pathways from T1 to T2. Model 3 adds diagonal pathways from T2 to T3. All models include paths from prior models in sequence. CLO= closeness; CON= conflict; SCE= school engagement; INAT/IMP= inattention/impulsivity; ACC= academic competence
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standardized path coefficients for significant paths of final model (Model 3). Notes. R2 values are denoted in parentheses. Numbers denote time point of data collection. Within-time associations are represented by +/− (please refer to Table 4 for coefficients). CLO= closeness; CON= conflict; SCE= school engagement; INAT/IMP= inattention/impulsivity; ACC= academic competence. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001 χ2 (29) = 63.84; CFI = 0.97; TLI = 0.92; RMSEA = 0.06

References

    1. Archambault I, Pagani L, Fitzpatrick C. Transactional associations between classroom engagement and relations with teachers from first through fourth grade. Learning and Instruction. 2013;23:1–9.
    1. Armstrong JM, Goldstein LH The MacArthur Working Group on Outcome Assessment. In: Manual for the MacArthur Health and Behavior Questionnaire (HBQ 1.0) Kupfer David J., Chair, editor. University of Pittsburgh: MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Psychopathology and Development; 2003.
    1. Arnold DH, McWilliams L, Arnold EH. Teacher Discipline and Child Misbehavior in Day Care: Untangling Causality With Correlational Data. Developmental Psychology. 1998;34:276–287. - PubMed
    1. Baker JA. Contributions of teacher–child relationships to positive school adjustment during elementary school. Journal of School Psychology. 2006;44:211–229.
    1. Baker JA, Grant S, Morlock L. The teacher-student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly. 2008;23:3–15.