Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 11;9(6):e99063.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099063. eCollection 2014.

External validation of a prognostic model for seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure and implications for driving

Affiliations

External validation of a prognostic model for seizure recurrence following a first unprovoked seizure and implications for driving

Laura Jayne Bonnett et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

  • PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113327

Abstract

Objective: In the United Kingdom and other European Union countries guidelines for driving following a first unprovoked seizure require the risk of another seizure in the next year to be less than 20%. Using data from one clinical trial, we previously developed a prognostic model to inform driving guidelines. The objective of this work is to externally validate our published model and demonstrate its generalisability.

Methods: A cohort of 620 people with a first unprovoked seizure was used to develop the original model which included variables for aetiology, first degree relative with epilepsy, seizures only while asleep, electroencephalogram, computed tomography or magnetic resonance scan result, and treatment policy. The validation cohorts consisted of 274 (United Kingdom), 305 (Italy), and 847 (Australia) people. The model was evaluated using discrimination and calibration methods. A covariate, missing from the Italian dataset, was handled via five imputation methods. Following external validation, the model was fitted to a pooled population comprising all validation datasets and the development dataset. The model was stratified by dataset.

Results: The model generalised relatively well. All methods of imputation performed fairly similarly. At six months, the risk of a seizure recurrence following a first ever seizure, based on the pooled datasets, is 15% (95% CI: (12% to 18%)) for patients who are treated immediately and 18% (95% CI: (15 to 21%)) otherwise. Individuals can be reliably stratified into risk groups according to the clinical factors included in the model.

Significance: Our prognostic model, used to inform driving regulations, has been validated and consequently has been proven as a valuable tool for predicting risk of seizure recurrence following a first seizure in people with various combinations of risk factors. Additionally, there is evidence to support one worldwide overall prognostic model for risk of second seizure following a first.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier curve for time from first to second seizure for MESS, NGPSE, WA and FIRST with numbers at risk.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Calibration plots for MESS compared to NGPSE (A), WA (B), FIRST - variable matching (C) and FIRST - hot deck imputation (D).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for risk groups in MESS (A) fitted to NGPSE (B), WA (C) and FIRST – hot deck imputation (D).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier curve for low risk patients in MESS, NGPSE, WA and FIRST – hot deck imputation.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Risk of seizure recurrence in next 12 months estimated from multivariable model at specific seizure-free periods.
Estimates presented assume seizures not confined to sleep and no first degree relative with epilepsy - MESS multivariable model fitted to super-population comprising MESS, NGPSE, WA and FIRST. Imm = Immediate; Crypto,/Idio/ = Cryptogenic/Idiopathic; Symptomatic = Remote symptomatic. Risks are risk of seizure in next 12 months with associated 95% confidence interval.

References

    1. Marson A, Jacoby A, Johnson A, Kim L, Gamble C, et al. (2005) Immediate versus deferred antiepileptic drug treatment for early epilepsy and single seizures: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365: 2007–2013. - PubMed
    1. Kim LG, Johnson TL, Marson AG, Chadwick DW (2006) Prediction of Risk of Seizure Recurrence after a Single Seizure and Early Epilepsy: Further Results from the MESS Trial. The Lancet Neurology 5: 317–322. - PubMed
    1. Bonnett LJ, Tudur-Smith C, Williamson PR, Marson AG (2010) Risk of recurrence after a first seizure and implications for driving: further analysis of the Multicentre study of early Epilepsy and Single Seizures. BMJ 341: c6477. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steyerberg EW (2009) Clinical Prediction Models. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
    1. Hart YM, Sander JWAS, Shorvon SD (1989) National General-Practice Study of Epilepsy and Epileptic Seizures - Objectives and Study Methodology of the Largest Reported Prospective Cohort Study of Epilepsy. Neuroepidemiology 8: 221–227. - PubMed

Publication types