Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;10(6):20140148.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0148.

Sex ratio influences the motivational salience of facial attractiveness

Affiliations

Sex ratio influences the motivational salience of facial attractiveness

Amanda C Hahn et al. Biol Lett. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

The sex ratio of the local population influences mating-related behaviours in many species. Recent experiments show that male-biased sex ratios increase the amount of financial resources men will invest in potential mates, suggesting that sex ratios influence allocation of mating effort in humans. To investigate this issue further, we tested for effects of cues to the sex ratio of the local population on the motivational salience of attractiveness in own-sex and opposite-sex faces. We did this using an effort-based key-press task, in which the motivational salience of facial attractiveness was assessed in samples of faces in which the ratio of male to female images was manipulated. The motivational salience of attractive opposite-sex, but not own-sex, faces was greater in the own-sex-biased (high competition for mates) than in the opposite-sex-biased (low competition for mates) condition. Moreover, this effect was not modulated by participant sex. These results present new evidence that sex ratio influences human mating-related behaviours. They also present the first evidence that the perceived sex ratio of the local population may modulate allocation of mating effort in women, as well as men.

Keywords: beauty; incentive salience; intrasexual competition; mate preferences; operational sex ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The significant two-way interaction between sex of target face and task version. Means and s.e.m. are shown.

References

    1. Watkins CD, Jones BC, Little AC, DeBruine LM, Feinberg DR. 2012. Cues to the sex ratio of the local population influence women's preferences for facial symmetry. Anim. Behav. 83, 545–553. (10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.12.002) - DOI
    1. Pollet TV, Nettle D. 2008. Driving a hard bargain: sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical U.S. population. Biol. Lett. 4, 31–33. (10.1098/rsbl.2007.0543) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pollet TV, Nettle D. 2009. Market forces affect patterns of polygyny in Uganda. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2114–2117. (10.1073/pnas.0810016106) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmitt DP. 2005. Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: a 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 247–275. (10.1017/S0140525X05000051) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Griskevicius V, Tybur JM, Ackerman JM, Delton AW, Robertson TE, White AE. 2012. The financial consequences of too many men: sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 69–80. (10.1037/a0024761) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types