Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Aug;150(8):844-9.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.8687.

Efficacy of a needling device for the treatment of acne scars: a randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of a needling device for the treatment of acne scars: a randomized clinical trial

Murad Alam et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Importance: Neocollagenesis can be achieved using a dermal rolling needle device, thereby reducing the appearance of acne scars.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of a needling device for treatment of acne scars.

Design, setting, and participants: We performed a single-center, rater-blinded, balanced (1:1), split-face, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomized clinical trial at an urban academic institution. The study took place from November 30, 2009, through July 27, 2010. Twenty healthy adults (age range, 20-65 years) with acne scars on both sides of the face were enrolled. Fifteen individuals completed the study, and no enrolled participants were withdrawn for adverse effects.

Interventions: For each participant, one side of the face was randomized for needling. Three needling treatments were performed at 2-week intervals.

Main outcomes and measures: Two blinded dermatologists separately rated participants' acne scars based on standard digital photographs obtained at baseline and at the 3-month and 6-month follow-up visits on the quantitative global scarring grading system.

Results: Mean scar scores were significantly lower in the treatment group compared with baseline at 6 months (mean difference, 3.4; 95% CI, 0.2-6.5; P = .03) and nominally but not significantly lower compared with baseline at 3 months (mean difference, 2.4; 95% CI, -0.01 to 4.8; P = .052). In the control group, mean scar scores did not vary significantly from baseline at 3 months (mean difference, 1.0; 95% CI, -1.4 to 3.4; P = .96) and at 6 months (mean difference, 0.4; 95% CI, -2.3 to 3.5; P > .99). The needling procedure was not particularly painful, with a mean pain rating of 1.08 of 10. Participants perceived a 41% mean improvement in overall scar appearance on the treated side. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions and relevance: After 3 needling treatments, there was improvement in the appearance of acne scars over time compared with the control group, with minimal pain reported.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00974870.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Associated data