Editorial
doi: 10.15252/embr.201438979.
Epub 2014 Jun 11.
Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the "new media" online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles?
Affiliations
- PMID: 24920610
- PMCID: PMC4196977
- DOI: 10.15252/embr.201438979
Item in Clipboard
Editorial
Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the "new media" online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles?
EMBO Rep.
2014 Jul.
No abstract available
Similar articles
-
Staying Afloat in the Rising Tide of Science.Cell. 2016 Mar 10;164(6):1094-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.042. Cell. 2016. PMID: 26967275
-
Scientific communication in a post-truth society.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7656-7661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805868115. Epub 2018 Nov 26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. PMID: 30478050 Free PMC article.
-
Social science. Science, new media, and the public.Science. 2013 Jan 4;339(6115):40-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1232329. Science. 2013. PMID: 23288529 No abstract available.
-
Mediated consumer-provider communication in cancer care: the empowering potential of new technologies.Patient Educ Couns. 2003 May;50(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00089-2. Patient Educ Couns. 2003. PMID: 12767594 Review.
-
Portals, blogs and co.: the role of the Internet as a medium of science communication.Biotechnol J. 2007 Sep;2(9):1129-40. doi: 10.1002/biot.200700163. Biotechnol J. 2007. PMID: 17703484 Review.
Cited by
-
Young Kidney Professionals' Perspectives and Attitudes about Consuming Scientific Information: A Focus Group Study.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Oct 8;13(10):1587-1597. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01760218. Epub 2018 Aug 24. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018. PMID: 30143529 Free PMC article.
-
The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time.Elife. 2017 Sep 5;6:e27725. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27725. Elife. 2017. PMID: 28873054 Free PMC article.
-
Opinion: Lay summaries needed to enhance science communication.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 24;112(12):3585-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500882112. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 25805804 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists.PLoS One. 2020 Jan 8;15(1):e0222250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222250. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 31914124 Free PMC article.
-
Engagement present and future: Graduate student and faculty perceptions of social media and the role of the public in science engagement.PLoS One. 2019 May 2;14(5):e0216274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216274. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31048919 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hilgartner S. The dominant view of popularization: conceptual problems, political uses. Soc Stud Sci. 1990;20:519–539.
-
- Weingart P. The lure of the mass media and its repercussions on science. In: Rödder S, Franzen M, Weingart P, editors. The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and its Repercussions. Dordrecht, NL: Springer; 2012. pp. 17–32.
-
- Jasanoff S. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva. 2003;41:223–244.
-
- Anderson AA, Brossard D, Scheufele DA, Xenos MA, Ladwig P. The “nasty effect:” online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2013;19:373–387.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
