Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 May 26;5(2):161-8.
doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v5.i2.161.

Value of a newly sequenced bacterial genome

Affiliations
Review

Value of a newly sequenced bacterial genome

Eudes Gv Barbosa et al. World J Biol Chem. .

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have made high-throughput sequencing available to medium- and small-size laboratories, culminating in a tidal wave of genomic information. The quantity of sequenced bacterial genomes has not only brought excitement to the field of genomics but also heightened expectations that NGS would boost antibacterial discovery and vaccine development. Although many possible drug and vaccine targets have been discovered, the success rate of genome-based analysis has remained below expectations. Furthermore, NGS has had consequences for genome quality, resulting in an exponential increase in draft (partial data) genome deposits in public databases. If no further interests are expressed for a particular bacterial genome, it is more likely that the sequencing of its genome will be limited to a draft stage, and the painstaking tasks of completing the sequencing of its genome and annotation will not be undertaken. It is important to know what is lost when we settle for a draft genome and to determine the "scientific value" of a newly sequenced genome. This review addresses the expected impact of newly sequenced genomes on antibacterial discovery and vaccinology. Also, it discusses the factors that could be leading to the increase in the number of draft deposits and the consequent loss of relevant biological information.

Keywords: Computational tools; Drafts; Next-generation sequencing; Omics; Prokaryotic genomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of complete genome and draft genome (partial data) deposits in public databases.
Figure 2
Figure 2
General workflow during sequencing process a bacterial genome.

References

    1. Zhang J, Chiodini R, Badr A, Zhang G. The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics. J Genet Genomics. 2011;38:95–109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prachi P, Donati C, Masciopinto F, Rappuoli R, Bagnoli F. Deep sequencing in pre- and clinical vaccine research. Public Health Genomics. 2013;16:62–68. - PubMed
    1. Pucci MJ. Use of genomics to select antibacterial targets. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;71:1066–1072. - PubMed
    1. Mills SD. When will the genomics investment pay off for antibacterial discovery? Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;71:1096–1102. - PubMed
    1. Pareek CS, Smoczynski R, Tretyn A. Sequencing technologies and genome sequencing. J Appl Genet. 2011;52:413–435. - PMC - PubMed