Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;96(3):320-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.015. Epub 2014 May 29.

Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities

Douglas J Rupert  1 , Rebecca R Moultrie  2 , Jennifer Gard Read  2 , Jacqueline B Amoozegar  3 , Alexandra S Bornkessel  2 , Amie C O'Donoghue  4 , Helen W Sullivan  4
Affiliations

Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities

Douglas J Rupert et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Many Internet users seek health information through online health communities (OHCs) and other social media. Yet few studies assess how individuals use peer-generated health information, and many healthcare providers (HCPs) believe OHCs interfere with patient-provider relationships. This study explored how individuals use OHC content in clinical discussions and how HCPs react to it.

Methods: We conducted in-person and virtual focus groups with patients/caregivers who visited OHCs (n=89). A trained moderator asked about reasons for membership, sharing OHC content with providers, HCP reactions, and preferred roles for HCPs. Two researchers independently coded verbatim transcripts (NVivo 9.2) and conducted thematic response analysis.

Results: Participants described OHCs as supplementing information from HCPs, whom they perceived as too busy for detailed discussions. Almost all participants shared OHC content with HCPs, although only half cited OHCs as the source. Most HCPs reacted negatively to OHC content, making participants feel disempowered. Despite these reactions, participants continued to use OHCs, and most desired HCP feedback on the accuracy of OHC content.

Conclusions: Individuals do not use OHCs to circumvent HCPs but instead to gather more in-depth information.

Practice implications: HCPs should discuss OHC content with patients to help them avoid misinformation and make more informed decisions.

Keywords: Online communities; Patient–provider communication; Shared decision making; Social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Focus Group Populations, Locations, and Sample Sizes
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013 [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2013. [cited 2014 Jan 3]. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Health-online.aspx.
    1. Fox S Health topics [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2011. [cited 2014 Jan 3]. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/HealthTopics.aspx.
    1. Fox S Peer-to-peer health care [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2011. [cited 2014 Jan 3]. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/P2PHealthcare.aspx.
    1. Fox S, Jones S. The social life of health information [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2009. [cited 2014 Jan 3]. Available from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/8-The-Social-Life-of-Health-Info....
    1. National Cancer Institute. Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) electronic codebook [Internet]. 2007. [cited 2014 Jan 3]. Available from http://hints.cancer.gov/questions.aspx.

Publication types