Pattern of mutation rates in the germline of Drosophila melanogaster males from a large-scale mutation screening experiment
- PMID: 24924332
- PMCID: PMC4132180
- DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.011056
Pattern of mutation rates in the germline of Drosophila melanogaster males from a large-scale mutation screening experiment
Abstract
The sperm or eggs of sexual organisms go through a series of cell divisions from the fertilized egg; mutations can occur at each division. Mutations in the lineage of cells leading to the sperm or eggs are of particular importance because many such mutations may be shared by somatic tissues and also may be inherited, thus having a lasting consequence. For decades, little has been known about the pattern of the mutation rates along the germline development. Recently it was shown from a small portion of data that resulted from a large-scale mutation screening experiment that the rates of recessive lethal or nearly lethal mutations differ dramatically during the germline development of Drosophila melanogaster males. In this paper the full data set from the experiment and its analysis are reported by taking advantage of a recent methodologic advance. By analyzing the mutation patterns with different levels of recessive lethality, earlier published conclusions based on partial data are found to remain valid. Furthermore, it is found that for most nearly lethal mutations, the mutation rate at the first cell division is even greater than previous thought compared with those at other divisions. There is also some evidence that the mutation rate at the second division decreases rapidly but is still appreciably greater than those for the rest of the cleavage stage. The mutation rate at spermatogenesis is greater than late cleavage and stem-cell stages, but there is no evidence that rates are different among the five cell divisions of the spermatogenesis. We also found that a modestly biased sampling, leading to slightly more primordial germ cells after the eighth division than those reported in the literature, provides the best fit to the data. These findings provide conceptual and numerical basis for exploring the consequences of differential mutation rates during individual development.
Keywords: Drosophila melanogaster; cell coalescent; germline mutation rate; likelihood inference.
Copyright © 2014 Gao et al.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Efficient Estimation of Mutation Rates during Individual Development by Minimization of Chi-Square.PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0135398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135398. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26266814 Free PMC article.
-
Highly variable recessive lethal or nearly lethal mutation rates during germ-line development of male Drosophila melanogaster.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 20;108(38):15914-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100233108. Epub 2011 Sep 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21890796 Free PMC article.
-
Statistical methods for analyzing Drosophila germline mutation rates.Genetics. 2013 Aug;194(4):927-36. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.151571. Epub 2013 May 1. Genetics. 2013. PMID: 23636740 Free PMC article.
-
The developmental basis for germline mosaicism in mouse and Drosophila melanogaster.Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):421-43. Genetica. 1998. PMID: 9720293 Review.
-
Biological basis of germline mutation: comparisons of spontaneous germline mutation rates among drosophila, mouse, and human.Environ Mol Mutagen. 1995;25 Suppl 26:48-64. doi: 10.1002/em.2850250609. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1995. PMID: 7789362 Review.
Cited by
-
A perspective on the evolution of germ-cell development and germinal mosaics of deleterious mutations.Genetica. 2015 Oct;143(5):563-9. doi: 10.1007/s10709-015-9854-1. Epub 2015 Jun 26. Genetica. 2015. PMID: 26113303 Review.
-
Interpreting the Dependence of Mutation Rates on Age and Time.PLoS Biol. 2016 Jan 13;14(1):e1002355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002355. eCollection 2016 Jan. PLoS Biol. 2016. PMID: 26761240 Free PMC article.
-
Efficient Estimation of Mutation Rates during Individual Development by Minimization of Chi-Square.PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0135398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135398. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26266814 Free PMC article.
-
Estimates of the Mutation Rate per Year Can Explain Why the Molecular Clock Depends on Generation Time.Mol Biol Evol. 2025 Apr 1;42(4):msaf069. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaf069. Mol Biol Evol. 2025. PMID: 40131319 Free PMC article.
-
Similarities and differences in patterns of germline mutation between mice and humans.Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 6;10(1):4053. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12023-w. Nat Commun. 2019. PMID: 31492841 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abrahamson S., Lewis E. B., 1971. The detection of mutations in Drosophila melanogaster, pp. 461–484 in Chemical Mutagens, edited by Hollaender A. Plenum Press, New York
-
- Ashburner M., 1989. Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
- Brodberg R. K., Mitchell M. J., Smith S. L., Woodruff R. C., 1987. Specific reduction of N-dimethylnitro-samine mutagenicity in Drosophila melanogaster by dimethyl sulfoxide. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 10: 425–432 - PubMed
-
- Crow J. F., 2006. Age and sex effects on human mutation rates: an old problem with new complexities. J. Radiat. Res. 47 Suppl B: B75–82 - PubMed
-
- Drost J. B., Lee W. R., 1995. Biological basis of germline mutation: Comparisons of spontaneous germline mutation rates among Drosophila, mouse and human. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 25(Suppl 26): 48–64 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases