Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;63(100):114-122.
doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.033.

Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels

Alison Mohr  1 , Sujatha Raman  1
Affiliations

Lessons from first generation biofuels and implications for the sustainability appraisal of second generation biofuels

Alison Mohr et al. Energy Policy. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Aims: The emergence of second generation (2G) biofuels is widely seen as a sustainable response to the increasing controversy surrounding the first generation (1G). Yet, sustainability credentials of 2G biofuels are also being questioned. Drawing on work in Science and Technology Studies, we argue that controversies help focus attention on key, often value-related questions that need to be posed to address broader societal concerns. This paper examines lessons drawn from the 1G controversy to assess implications for the sustainability appraisal of 2G biofuels.

Scope: We present an overview of key 1G sustainability challenges, assess their relevance for 2G, and highlight the challenges for policy in managing the transition. We address limitations of existing sustainability assessments by exploring where challenges might emerge across the whole system of bioenergy and the wider context of the social system in which bioenergy research and policy are done.

Conclusions: Key lessons arising from 1G are potentially relevant to the sustainability appraisal of 2G biofuels depending on the particular circumstances or conditions under which 2G is introduced. We conclude that sustainability challenges commonly categorised as either economic, environmental or social are, in reality, more complexly interconnected (so that an artificial separation of these categories is problematic).

Keywords: Biofuels; Sustainability; Whole system.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. AEA/NNFCC, 2010. Closing the loop: optimising food, feed, fuel and energy production oppportunities in the UK. 〈http://www.nnfcc.co.uk/tools/closing-the-loop-optimising-food-feed-fuel....
    1. Action Aid, 2010. Meals per gallon, Action Aid, London. 〈http://www.actionaid.org.uk/doc_lib/meals_per_gallon_final.pdf〉.
    1. Barker, A.M., Riddington, C., 2003. Attitudes to Renewable Energy, MVA Project Number C32906, COI Communications, DTI, London. 〈www.dti.gov.uk/renewables/renew_1.2.1.4a.htm〉.
    1. Black M.J., Whittaker C., Hosseini S.A., Diaz-Chavez R., Woods J., Murphy R.J. Life cycle assessment and sustainability methodologies for assessing industrial crops, processes and end products. Industrial Crops and Products. 2011;34:1332–1339.
    1. Bryman A. fourth ed. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2012. Social Research Methods.

LinkOut - more resources