Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;24(5):968-75.
doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.925719.

Enhancing trial integrity by protecting the independence of data monitoring committees in clinical trials

Affiliations

Enhancing trial integrity by protecting the independence of data monitoring committees in clinical trials

Thomas R Fleming et al. J Biopharm Stat. 2014.

Abstract

Data monitoring committees (DMCs) have important roles in safeguarding patient interests and enhancing trial integrity and credibility. To effectively fulfill their responsibilities, DMCs should be independent of study sponsors, study investigators, and caregivers managing study participants. Unfortunately, in real-world settings where DMCs are in place, there are some practices that threaten to diminish the level of independence of these committees. To address this, some important approaches should be considered: A DMC charter should outline the roles and responsibilities of the DMC without appearing to be a legal contract; the meetings of the DMC should be led by its chair, ideally with a meeting format that ensures independence from the investigators and sponsor; the DMC and those having leadership roles in the monitoring process should have adequate training and experience; procedures should be in place to enable the DMC to have access to interim safety and efficacy data that are accurate, current, and comprehensive; these data should be presented to the DMC unblinded by treatment group, while being kept confidential from all others; DMC recommendations should be developed through consensus development rather than by casting votes; creative approaches are needed for the engagement of DMC members to increase the transparency such that they are neither employees of nor consultants to the sponsor of the trial; meaningful conflicts of interest should be identified and addressed; and finally, members of DMCs should have adequate indemnification that provides effective protection.

Keywords: Confidentiality; Conflict of interest; DMC charter; Indemnification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have commercial or other associations that might pose a conflict of interest.

References

    1. Hennekens CH, DeMets D. The need for large scale randomized evidence without undue emphasis on small trials, meta-analyses or subgroup analyses. JAMA. 2009;302:2361–2362. - PubMed
    1. Hennekens CH, DeMets D. Data and safety monitoring boards of randomized trials: emerging principles and practical suggestions. Clin Invest. 2011;1:1–5.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for clinical trial sponsors: establishment and operation of clinical trial data monitoring committees. 2005 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM127073.pdf.
    1. Ellenberg S, Fleming T, DeMets D. Data Monitoring Committees in Clinical Trials: A Practical Perspective. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002.
    1. Fleming TR, Sharples K, McCall J, Moore A, Rodgers A, Stewart R. Maintaining confidentiality of interim data to enhance trial integrity and credibility. Clinical Trials. 2008;5:157–167. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources