Enhancing trial integrity by protecting the independence of data monitoring committees in clinical trials
- PMID: 24926941
- PMCID: PMC4153744
- DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2014.925719
Enhancing trial integrity by protecting the independence of data monitoring committees in clinical trials
Abstract
Data monitoring committees (DMCs) have important roles in safeguarding patient interests and enhancing trial integrity and credibility. To effectively fulfill their responsibilities, DMCs should be independent of study sponsors, study investigators, and caregivers managing study participants. Unfortunately, in real-world settings where DMCs are in place, there are some practices that threaten to diminish the level of independence of these committees. To address this, some important approaches should be considered: A DMC charter should outline the roles and responsibilities of the DMC without appearing to be a legal contract; the meetings of the DMC should be led by its chair, ideally with a meeting format that ensures independence from the investigators and sponsor; the DMC and those having leadership roles in the monitoring process should have adequate training and experience; procedures should be in place to enable the DMC to have access to interim safety and efficacy data that are accurate, current, and comprehensive; these data should be presented to the DMC unblinded by treatment group, while being kept confidential from all others; DMC recommendations should be developed through consensus development rather than by casting votes; creative approaches are needed for the engagement of DMC members to increase the transparency such that they are neither employees of nor consultants to the sponsor of the trial; meaningful conflicts of interest should be identified and addressed; and finally, members of DMCs should have adequate indemnification that provides effective protection.
Keywords: Confidentiality; Conflict of interest; DMC charter; Indemnification.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors do not have commercial or other associations that might pose a conflict of interest.
References
-
- Hennekens CH, DeMets D. The need for large scale randomized evidence without undue emphasis on small trials, meta-analyses or subgroup analyses. JAMA. 2009;302:2361–2362. - PubMed
-
- Hennekens CH, DeMets D. Data and safety monitoring boards of randomized trials: emerging principles and practical suggestions. Clin Invest. 2011;1:1–5.
-
- US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for clinical trial sponsors: establishment and operation of clinical trial data monitoring committees. 2005 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM127073.pdf.
-
- Ellenberg S, Fleming T, DeMets D. Data Monitoring Committees in Clinical Trials: A Practical Perspective. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2002.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources