Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;273(1):241-60.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132958. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update

Affiliations

Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update

Muneeb Ahmed et al. Radiology. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Image-guided tumor ablation has become a well-established hallmark of local cancer therapy. The breadth of options available in this growing field increases the need for standardization of terminology and reporting criteria to facilitate effective communication of ideas and appropriate comparison among treatments that use different technologies, such as chemical (eg, ethanol or acetic acid) ablation, thermal therapies (eg, radiofrequency, laser, microwave, focused ultrasound, and cryoablation) and newer ablative modalities such as irreversible electroporation. This updated consensus document provides a framework that will facilitate the clearest communication among investigators regarding ablative technologies. An appropriate vehicle is proposed for reporting the various aspects of image-guided ablation therapy including classification of therapies, procedure terms, descriptors of imaging guidance, and terminology for imaging and pathologic findings. Methods are addressed for standardizing reporting of technique, follow-up, complications, and clinical results. As noted in the original document from 2003, adherence to the recommendations will improve the precision of communications in this field, leading to more accurate comparison of technologies and results, and ultimately to improved patient outcomes. Online supplemental material is available for this article .

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Goldberg SN, Charboneau JW, Dodd GD, 3rd, et al. . Image-guided tumor ablation: proposal for standardization of terms and reporting criteria. Radiology 2003;228 (2):335–345. - PubMed
    1. Froeling V, Meckelburg K, Schreiter NF, et al. . Outcome of uterine artery embolization versus MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids: long-term results. Eur J Radiol 2013;82 (12):2265–2269. - PubMed
    1. Groeschl RT, Pilgrim CH, Hanna EM, et al. . Microwave ablation for hepatic malignancies: a multiinstitutional analysis. Ann Surg 2014;259 (6):1195–1200. - PubMed
    1. Narayanan G, Hosein PJ, Arora G, et al. . Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for downstaging and control of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012;23 (12):1613–1621. - PubMed
    1. Kim YS, Lim HK, Rhim H, et al. . Ten-year outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation as first-line therapy of early hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of prognostic factors. J Hepatol 2013;58 (1):89–97. - PubMed