Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 13;9(6):e99787.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099787. eCollection 2014.

Postoperative recovery of visual function after macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Affiliations

Postoperative recovery of visual function after macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Mathijs A J van de Put et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: To determine which factors affect the recovery of visual function in macula off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods: In a prospective study of forty-five patients with a primary macula-off RRD of 24 hours to 6 weeks duration, the height of the macular detachment was determined by ultrasonography. At 12 months postoperatively, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast acuity, and color confusion indexes (CCI) were obtained.

Results: Macular detachment was present for 2-32 (median 7) days before repair. A shorter duration of macular detachment was correlated with a better CCI saturé (p = 0.0026) and lower LogMAR BCVA (better Snellen visual acuity) (p = 0.012). Also, a smaller height of macular detachment was correlated with a lower LogMAR BCVA (p = 0.0034). A younger age and lower pre-operative LogMAR BCVA at presentation were both correlated with better postoperative contrast acuity in the total group (age: p = 1.7×10(-4) and pre-operative LogMAR BCVA: p = 0.0034).

Conclusion: Functional recovery after macula-off RRD is affected by the duration and the height of the macular detachment. Recovery of contrast acuity is also affected by age and BCVA at presentation.

Meeting presentation: ARVO annual meeting 2013, May 7, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Trial registration: trialregister.nl NTR839.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Method to measure the height of the foveal detachment by ultrasonography.
a. Schematic drawing of the measurement of the distance between the center of the optic nerve head and fovea, and assessment of the angle between their connecting line with the horizon. b. Drawing of the measurement of the distance between the center of the optic nerve head (determined by drawing a circle along the outer edge of the optic disc, excluding the area of peripapillary atrophy) and fovea, and assessment of the angle between their connecting line with the horizon made on a fundus photograph. c. Schematic position of the ultrasound probe at the correct angle between the horizon and the connecting line between the center of the optic nerve head and the fovea based on the measurement made on the fundus photograph d. Measurement of the height of the retinal detachment by ultrasonography at the measured distance between the center of the optic nerve head and the fovea, as obtained by measuring this distance on the fundus photograph.

References

    1. van de Put MAJ, Hooymans JM, Los LI (2013) The Dutch Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study Group (2013) The incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the Netherlands. Ophthalmology 120: 616–622. - PubMed
    1. Tani PT, Robertson DM, Langworthy A (1981) Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detached. Am J Ophthalmol 92: 611–620. - PubMed
    1. Pastor JC, Fernández I, Rodríguez de la Rúa E, Coco R, Sanabria-Ruiz Colmenares MR, et al. (2008) Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project – report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 92: 378–382. - PubMed
    1. D'Amico DJ (2008) Primary retinal detachment. N Engl J Med 359: 2346–2354. - PubMed
    1. Chignell AH, Fison LG, Davies EW, Hartley RE, Gundry MF (1973) Failure in retinal detachment surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 57: 525–530. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

Associated data