Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jun 14:15:227.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-227.

Cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost effectiveness of group follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Paddy Gillespie et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: This study examines the cost effectiveness of group follow-up after participation in the Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) structured education programme for type 1 diabetes.

Methods: Economic evaluation conducted alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial involving 437 adults with type 1 diabetes in Ireland. Group follow-up involved two group education 'booster' sessions post-DAFNE. Individual follow-up involved two standard one-to-one hospital clinic visits. Incremental costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and cost effectiveness were estimated at 18 months. Uncertainty was explored using sensitivity analysis and by estimating cost effectiveness acceptability curves.

Results: Group follow-up was associated with a mean reduction in QALYs gained of 0.04 per patient (P value, 0.052; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.01, intra-class correlation (ICC), 0.033) and a mean reduction in total healthcare costs of €772 (P value, 0.020; 95% CI, -1,415 to -128: ICC, 0.016) per patient. At alternative threshold values of €5,000, €15,000, €25,000, €35,000, and €45,000, the probability of group follow-up being cost effective was estimated to be 1.000, 0.762, 0.204, 0.078, and 0.033 respectively.

Conclusions: The results do not support implementation of group follow-up as the sole means of follow-up post-DAFNE. Given the reported cost savings, future studies should explore the cost effectiveness of alternative models of group care for diabetes.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN79759174 (assigned: 9 February 2007).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cost effectiveness acceptability curves for group follow up and individual follow up.

References

    1. Oliver L, Thompson G. The DAFNE Collaborative. Experiences of developing a nationally delivered evidence-based, quality-assured programme for people with type 1 diabetes. Pract Diab Int. 2009;26:371–377. doi:10.1002/pdi.1424.
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the Use of Patient-Education Models for Diabetes. Technology Appraisal 60. NICE; 2003. http://publications.nice.org.uk/guidance-on-the-use-of-patient-education....
    1. Shearer A, Bagust D, Sanderson S, Heller S, Roberts S. Cost-effectiveness of flexible intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes in the UK. Diabet Med. 2004;21:460–467. - PubMed
    1. Dinneen S, O'Hara M, Byrne M, Smith D, Courtney C, McGurk C, Heller S, Newell J, Coffey N, Breen C, O’Scannail M, O'Shea D. Group follow-up compared to individual clinic visits after structured education for type 1 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;100:29–38. - PubMed
    1. Dinneen S, O' Hara M, Byrne M, Newell J, Daly L, O' Shea D, Smith D. The Irish DAFNE Study Protocol: a cluster randomised trial of group versus individual follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes. Trials. 2009;10:88. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data