Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun 13;4(6):e005282.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005282.

Effect of a redesigned fracture management pathway and 'virtual' fracture clinic on ED performance

J Vardy  1 , P J Jenkins  2 , K Clark  1 , M Chekroud  1 , K Begbie  1 , I Anthony  2 , L A Rymaszewski  2 , A J Ireland  1
Affiliations

Effect of a redesigned fracture management pathway and 'virtual' fracture clinic on ED performance

J Vardy et al. BMJ Open. .

Erratum in

  • BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e005282corr1

Abstract

Objectives: Collaboration between the orthopaedic and emergency medicine (ED) services has resulted in standardised treatment pathways, leaflet supported discharge and a virtual fracture clinic review. Patients with minor, stable fractures are discharged with no further follow-up arranged. We aimed to examine the time taken to assess and treat these patients in the ED along with the rate of unplanned reattendance.

Design: A retrospective study was undertaken that covered 1 year before the change and 1 year after. Prospectively collected administrative data from the electronic patient record system were analysed and compared before and after the change.

Setting: An ED and orthopaedic unit, serving a population of 300 000, in a publicly funded health system.

Participants: 2840 patients treated with referral to a traditional fracture clinic and 3374 patients managed according to the newly redesigned protocol.

Outcome measures: Time for assessment and treatment of patients with orthopaedic injuries not requiring immediate operative management, and 7-day unplanned reattendance.

Results: Where plaster backslabs were replaced with removable splints, the consultation time was reduced. There was no change in treatment time for other injuries treated by the new discharge protocol. There was no increase in unplanned ED attendance, related to the injury, within 7 days (p=0.149). There was a decrease in patients reattending the ED due to a missed fracture clinic appointment.

Conclusions: This process did not require any new time resources from the ED staff. This process brought significant benefits to the ED as treatment pathways were agreed. The pathway reduced unnecessary reattendance of patients at face-to-face fracture clinics for a review of stable, self-limiting injuries.

Keywords: Accident & Emergency Medicine; Audit; Health Services Administration & Management; Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Beiri A, Alani A, Ibrahim T, et al. Trauma rapid review process: efficient out-patient fracture management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:408–11 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams SC, Hollins D, Barden-Marshall S, et al. Improving the quality of patient care: patient satisfaction with a nurse-led fracture clinic service. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003;85:115–16 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jayram PR, Bahattacharyya R, Jenkins PJ, et al. Patient satisfaction following management of radial head and neck fractures in a virtual fracture clinic. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:297–301 - PubMed
    1. Williams KG, Smith G, Luhmann SJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of cast versus splint for distal radial buckle fracture: an evaluation of satisfaction, convenience, and preference. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013;29:555–9 - PubMed
    1. Ahn H, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, et al. The use of hospital registries in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91 (Suppl 3):68–72 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources