Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;32(2):55-61.
doi: 10.3109/02813432.2014.929811. Epub 2014 Jun 15.

Increased primary health care use in the first year after colorectal cancer diagnosis

Affiliations

Increased primary health care use in the first year after colorectal cancer diagnosis

Daan Brandenbarg et al. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: The view that the general practitioner (GP) should be more involved during the curative treatment of cancer is gaining support. This study aimed to assess the current role of the GP during treatment of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

Design: Historical prospective study, using primary care data from two cohorts.

Setting: Registration Network Groningen (RNG) consisting of 18 GPs in three group practices with a dynamic population of about 30,000 patients.

Subjects: Patients who underwent curative treatment for CRC (n = 124) and matched primary care patients without CRC (reference population; n = 358).

Main outcome measures: Primary healthcare use in the period 1998-2009.

Findings: Patients with CRC had higher primary healthcare use in the year after diagnosis compared with the reference population. After correction for age, gender, and consultation behaviour, CRC patients had 54% (range 23-92%) more face-to-face contacts, 68% (range 36-108%) more drug prescriptions, and 35% (range -4-90%) more referrals compared with reference patients. Patients consulted their GP more often for reasons related to anaemia, abdominal pain, constipation, skin problems, and urinary infections. GPs also prescribed more acid reflux drugs, laxatives, anti-anaemic preparations, analgesics, and psycholeptics for CRC patients.

Conclusions: The GP plays a significant role in the year after CRC diagnosis. This role may be associated with treatment-related side effects and psychological problems. Formal guidelines on the involvement of the GP during CRC treatment might ensure more effective allocation and communication of care between primary and secondary healthcare services.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; The Netherlands; general practitioners; healthcare use; primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the inclusion of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Summerton N. General practitioners and cancer. BMJ. 2000;320:1090–1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Astin M, Griffin T, Neal RD, Rose P, Hamilton W. The diagnostic value of symptoms for colorectal cancer in primary care: A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61((586)):e231–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anvik T, Holtedahl KA, Mikalsen H. “When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me”: The role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer – a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:19–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Johansen ML, Holtedahl KA, Rudebeck CE. A doctor close at hand: How GPs view their role in cancer care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010;28:249–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meulepas JM, Kiemeney LALM, . In Meulepas JM, Kiemeney LALM. Kanker in Nederland tot 2020. Trends en prognoses [Cancer in the Netherlands till 2020. Trends and prognosis ] Amsterdam: KWF Kankerbestrijding; p. 2011.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources