In vitro evaluation of the fracture strength of all-ceramic core materials on zirconium posts
- PMID: 24932121
- PMCID: PMC4053671
- DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.120671
In vitro evaluation of the fracture strength of all-ceramic core materials on zirconium posts
Abstract
Objective: For most endodontically treated teeth, tooth-colored post-core systems are preferable for esthetic reasons. Therefore, improvements in material strength must also consider tooth colored post-core complexes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in tooth colored post-core complex strengths.
Materials and methods: A total of 33 human maxillary central incisor teeth were used for this study, with three groups of 11 teeth. Three different methods were used to fabricate all-ceramic post-core restorations: zirconia blanks, Cerec 3D-milled to one-piece post-core restorations (Test Group 1); feldspathic cores (from feldspathic prefabricated CAD/CAM blocks) adhesively luted to CosmoPost zirconia posts (Test Group 2); and IPS Empress cores directly pressed to CosmoPost zirconia posts (Test Group 3). All-ceramic crowns from feldspathic ceramic were constructed using a CAD/CAM system (Cerec 3D) for all specimens. The post-core complexes were tested to failure with the load applied at 45° angled relative to the tooth long axis. The load at fracture was recorded.
Results: The maximum fracture strength of the milled zirconia cores (Test Group 1) was 577 N; corresponding values for the milled feldspathic cores (Test Group 2) and the pressed cores (Test Group 3) were 586 and 585 N, respectively. Differences were not statistically significant at P < 0.05 (P = 0.669).
Conclusions: All-ceramic cores adhesively luted on zirconia posts and one-piece all-ceramic zirconium post-core structures offer a viable alternative to conventional pressing.
Keywords: All-ceramic crown; all-ceramic post-core; one-piece post-core; zirconium post-core.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:431–7. - PubMed
-
- Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. A new prefabricated post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:631–4. - PubMed
-
- Morgano SM, Brackett SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: Current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:643–57. - PubMed
-
- Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Kosmac T, Funduk N, Marion L. Fracture resistance and reliability of new zirconia posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:342–8. - PubMed
-
- Hedlund SO, Johansson NG, Sjögren G. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro. Br Dent J. 2003;195:155–8. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
